Some of the changed data is correct, but some diagnostics are incorrect
Corner cases like having both contains(Object) and contains(String)
within implementation of Collection<String> is not supported
To do so, inside the root cause of inapplicable candidate errors,
we will record expected/actual type of receiver, if any.
That will help identifying inapplicable calls on nullable receiver.
There was a refactoring of AbstractDiagnosticsTest in 9052ef06 which
contains bug that `setupEnvironment` for AbstractDiagnosticsTestUsingJavac
was not called, so for last year tests `UsingJavac` had no difference
with usual diagnostics tests which causes some contradictions in test data
Update includes:
- Changing syntax of `OI/`NI` tags from `<!NI;TAG!>` to `<!TAG{NI}!>`
- Fix some incorrect directives
- Change order of diagnostics in some places
- Remove ignored diagnostics from FIR test data (previously `DIAGNOSTICS` didn't work)
- Update FIR dumps in some places and add `FIR_IDENTICAL` if needed
- Replace all JAVAC_SKIP with SKIP_JAVAC directive
Previously helpers from checkType.kt was in special package, and
if directive was enabled then test runner (`AbstractDiagnosticTest`)
injected additional imports to test files and removed them after test
was completed.
It's very hard to support such behavior in new test infrastructure so
there was a decision about changing `CHECK_TYPE`:
1. All helpers from `checkType.kt` now stays in default package
2. `CHECK_TYPE` only adds `checkType.kt` to set of analyzed files
and don't modify their content
For test which are written in default package (most of tests actually)
there are no changes. On the other hand if there is a test where dev
want to use checkType functions in testfile with some package then he
should explicitly import functions which he needed (`checkSubtype`,
`checkType`, `_`)
In this commit we change value parameter type of containsAll, removeAll,
retainAll from Java collections. Originally it's Collection<?>,
we change it to Collection<T>
#KT-42340 Fixed
This commit introduces several different things, in particular:
- check type arguments in expressions
- new TypeArgumentList node to deal with diagnostic source
- ConeDiagnostic was moved to fir:cones
- ConeIntermediateDiagnostic to use in inference (?) without reporting
- detailed diagnostics on error type
Before this commit, we had effective visibility as a part of FIR status,
so it was integrated into the full pipeline. In this commit,
we introduced "effective visibility as a service" which is now used
only by exposed visibility checker. This allows us to make the thing
universal for all FIR nodes, including nodes for Java / deserialized.
For Java, they have rather different semantics considering "overrides"
and obtaining functions/properties from supertypes
See the Java statics implementation
Dmitriy Novozhilov