In 1.3.31 I fixed Java interop for inline function with coroutines
(TL;DR: when we need a state machine, generate two methods: one with
normal name, and the other one with $$forInline suffix, for the inliner
to use, just like inline suspend functions), however, I forgot a case
with inline suspend function with inline suspend function parameter.
In this case, the compiler a generated two functions, as needed, but,
neither of them had a state-machine. This change adds the state-machine
for the method with normal name. Note, that suspend inline functions
with crossinline parameter, which are also supported by the change,
did not cause incorrect behaviour, since until now they were generated
as synthetic.
#KT-31354 Fixed
Previously, inline suspend functions were effectively inline only,
but ordinary inline functions can be used as noinline.
To fix the issue, I generate two functions: one for inline with suffix
$$forInline and without state machine; and the other one without any
suffix and state machine for direct calls.
This change does not affect effectively inline only suspend functions,
i.e. functions with reified generics, annotated with @InlineOnly
annotation and functions with crossinline parameters.
#KT-20219: Fixed
Mikhael Bogdanov