In cases when the test has the JVM_TARGET directive, use that one for
Java compilation as well.
Otherwise, for box tests, the corresponding test in `JvmTarget6OnJvm6`
(module `:compiler:tests-different-jdk`) will fail. However, it affects
all codegen tests, so fix a bunch of them which use Java 8+ features to
explicitly compile with JVM target 1.8. In particular, this obsoletes
the SKIP_JDK6 directive in those tests because "JVM_TARGET: 1.8" also
skips it for JDK 6.
The check for IS_SOURCE_6_STILL_SUPPORTED is needed in order to still be
able to run tests in the project while only having a single JDK > 11
installed, and having all of the env vars JDK_16, JDK_17, JDK_18
pointing to that JDK.
This commit includes three changes:
1. 'EnhancedNullability' is no more set for declaration types
2. It is no more used for conversion types in translator
3. Translator inserts implicit not-null cast only when enhanced type is cast to not-null type.
The current implementation doesn't consider Foo a subtype of Captured<in
Foo>!!, since AbstractTypeCheckerContext::checkSubtypeForSpecialCases
does not handle DefinitelyNotNullType cases. This PR adds handling of
DefinitelyNotNullType by looking at its original type.
^KT-42824 Fixed
The issue is the type checker doesn't consider P? a subtype of
CapturedType<in P>?, whereas P a subtype of CapturedType<in P>?. In
AbstractTypeCheckerContext::checkSubtypeForSpecialCases, it checks if
P? is a subtype of the lower type of the captured type, which is
P, and returns false.
This fix uses nullable version of the lower type when the captured
type is marked nullable. To check if P? is a subtype of Captured<in
P>?, we check the LHS, P?, against the nullable lower type of RHS,
P?.
^KT-42825 Fixed
- Allow participating subtypes of functional types in conversions
- Fix several subtle inconsistencies
- Place logic about conversions at one place
Now conversions operations have two stages: before usual subtyping
check and after one. This is needed to support conversions of
subtypes (of functional types, for example). First, the compiler
checks if it possible to resolve an argument without conversion and
only then it tries to perform conversion.
Note that it'd be incorrect to perform conversion eagerly as it can
change resolve (Runnable & () -> Unit <: KRunnable), plus we can't
guess whether conversion is needed at all as it's important not to
look into supertypes if resolution doesn't actually needed it
#KT-36448 Fixed
#KT-37574 Fixed
#KT-38604 Fixed
Vasily Levchenko