This change covers the case where some f/o was generated in common module
and it is referenced in platform code. But signature of this f/o may be
different in different modules because of e.g. actualization of value
parameters with actual typealias
^KT-60850 Fixed
Atomicfu compiler plugin supported transformations for K/N:
* atomic properties are replaced with volatile properties and all the operations are delegated to native atomic intrinsics
* atomic arrays are replaced with kotlin.concurrent.Atomic*Arrays
* all other features available on JVM are covered as well (custom atomic extensions, delegated properties, debug tracing)
See (KT-58358, https://github.com/Kotlin/kotlinx-atomicfu/issues/261)
Merge-request: KT-MR-11253
Merged-by: Maria Sokolova <maria.sokolova@jetbrains.com>
By ignoring type parameters. Since type parameters in annotations are a
very limited feature, their sole use is to be able to specify them as
KClass argument: annotation class Foo<T: Any>(val bar: KClass<T>).
Since we can encounter type param only as a KClass type argument (and
never as a property type), simple approach of ignoring them works fine.
In that case, since we simply copy property types to synthetic
implementation class, its properties in IR start look like this:
annotation class FooImpl(override val bar: KClass<T of Foo>). This IR
seems to be not completely correct, since FooImpl.bar type contains T of
Foo param, which is out of its scope. However, so far I didn't
encounter any problems with this during testing and after MR discussion
this approach has been considered possible.
#KT-59558 Fixed
#KT-59036 Fixed
Implementation is very similar to the `enumValues` intrinsic.
Java enums and old (pre-1.9) Kotlin enums will be supported in a
subsequent commit.
#KT-59710
Invocation of atomic intrinsics is only allowed on property references that are known at compile time. This commit makes it possible to also invoke intrinsics on a constant property reference getter passed as an argument.
See KT-58359
Co-authored-by: Pavel Kunyavskiy <Pavel.Kunyavskiy@jetbrains.com>
Merge-request: KT-MR-10413
Merged-by: Maria Sokolova <maria.sokolova@jetbrains.com>
If forward declaration exists in a library, it was
possible to import it both by forward declaration name
and normal library name. This is strange unique behavior.
And it would also make KT-59643 changes binary incompatible.
So from now it's only possible to import forward declaration by
forward declaration name only.
^KT-59642
In early prototypes of interpreter, it was easier to assume that
all classes from Java can be interpreted and fix something if not.
Check for Java declaration was done by checking that the package name is
starting with "java". But this is actually wrong and can lead to errors
when some code is declared in "java" something package, but is not from
Java stdlib.
#KT-60467 Fixed
This is important for IR lowerings like PolymorphicSignatureLowering
which are very sensitive about the correct types of expressions and
placement of coercions to Unit (KT-59218).
A boolean parameter to `insertImplicitCasts` is not the best solution to
ensure that coercion to Unit is added. The best solution would be to fix
the TODO and generate coercion to the block's type for the last
statement. But that will affect many other places and will need to be
done separately => KT-59781.
Code in IrInterpreter is uncommented to fix the FIR test
`compiler/testData/ir/interpreter/exceptions/tryFinally.kt`; otherwise
evaluation of the function `returnTryFinally` there crashes with
"NoSuchElementException: ArrayDeque is empty". No idea why this test
didn't fail for K1 though, since the created IR is exactly the same.
For some unknown reason this breaks WASM backend with K2, but not with
K1 => KT-59800.
This aligns the behavior with K1 and fixes an issue when the default
value was deserialized as FirExpressionStub leading to an exception
in FIR2IR when trying to convert it to an IR expression.
#KT-60120 Fixed
#KT-59610 Fixed
Supported atomic update of elements for IntArray, LongArray and Array<T>
See KT-58360
Merge-request: KT-MR-11020
Merged-by: Maria Sokolova <maria.sokolova@jetbrains.com>
This is refactoring in preparation for KT-59764.
Names and layout of forward declarations related classes
was copy-pasted many times over compiler code.
Implementing KT-59764 would require copy-pasting it two more times.
So instead of doing this it was put in single place.
No behaviour changes intended in this commit.
Alexander Korepanov