The tests are removed because JvmDefault is going to be deprecated with
error in KT-54746 and removed later in KT-57696.
Many of the removed tests already had existing counterparts with the new
modes `all` and `all-compatibility`. In this change, I've added such
tests where they were missing, and removed tests which were testing
behavior specific to the JvmDefault annotation, such as some
diagnostics.
#KT-54746
For CallKind.VariableAccess, the condition when to *skip* resolution of
objects was previously collector.isSuccess. This wasn't strict enough
because collector.isSuccess could be true when the best found candidate
has an applicability like RESOLVED_WITH_LOW_PRIORITY (e.g. from dynamic
scope or annotated with @LowPriorityInOverloadResolution). In these
cases, we do want to resolve objects. To fix this, the condition is
changed to collector.shouldStopResolve which is stricter.
#KT-57960 Fixed
The change is needed for the parallel resolution (^KT-55750), so we can resolve the declaration
under a lock that is specific to this declaration.
Previously, if LL FIR was resolving some FirClass, LL FIR resolved all its children too, and it had no control over what parts of the FIR tree were modified.
The same applied to the designation path, sometimes the classes on the designation path
might be unexpectedly (and without lock) modified.
This commit introduces LLFirResolveTarget, which specifies which exact declarations should be resolved during the lazy resolution of the declaration.
All elements outside the declarations specified for resolve in LLFirResolveTarget, should not be modified.
The logic of lazy transformers is the following:
- Go to target declaration collecting all scopes from the file and containing classes
- Resolve only declarations that are specified by the LLFirResolveTarget, performing the resolve under a separate lock for each declaration
^KT-56543
^KT-57619 Fixed
Since we forbid overriding `equals` for
value classes, and value classes may only
implement interfaces, we know everything
about their `equals`, hence we can
guarantee if it always returns `false`
for different value classes.
The compiler should only report diagnostics for
comparisons over builtins and identity-less types,
other incompatibilities should be reported
via inspections.
It's ok that in `equalityChecksOnIntegerTypes`
instead of `EQUALITY_NOT_APPLICABLE_WARNING` we get
`EQUALITY_NOT_APPLICABLE`, because
`ProperEqualityChecksInBuilderInferenceCalls`
is already active by default.
This change also replaces the notion of a representative superclass
with the least upper bound.
This makes complex types like
intersection/flexible transparent to
RULES1-based compatibility checks.
One way to look at it is to think
that this is an automatic way of handling
type parameters: automatic picking of
"interesting" bounds, and checking them against one another.
Note that `TypeIntersector.intersectTypes`
for `Int` and `T` where `T` is a type parameter
may return both `{Int & T}` or `null`
depending on `T`-s bounds. At the same time,
for type parameters `T` and `K` it will
always return `{T & K}`.
`ConeTypeIntersector.intersectTypes`, on the
other hand, will always return `{Int & T}`
irrespectively of the bounds. Meaning, the two
intersectors differ in corner cases.
`lowerBoundIfFlexible` call in `isLiterallyTypeParameter` is backed by
the `equalityOfFlexibleTypeParameters` test.
^KT-35134 #fixed-in-k2
^KT-22499 #fixed-in-k2
^KT-46383 #fixed-in-k2
This is the way it works in K1.
See `OverloadingConflictResolver.kt:345`.
^KT-57568 Fixed
Merge-request: KT-MR-9395
Merged-by: Nikolay Lunyak <Nikolay.Lunyak@jetbrains.com>
Note: here we set sinceVersion = null for this feature.
However, we plan in 1.9.* - 2.0 time frame to solve KT-56377
and to enable this feature in 2.0, the latest in 2.1.
The expression needs to be resolved first to determine if there is a
receiver that needs to be extracted to a temporary variable. Also, the
special case for prefix increment/decrement on local variable without
delegates requires resolution to check if the variable is local.
^KT-56771 Fixed
^KT-56659 Fixed
Annotation arguments that are resolved in COMPILER_REQUIRED_ANNOTATIONS
phase are resolved again in ANNOTATION_ARGUMENTS phase. If they resolve
to a different symbol, report an error.
KT-56177
If an annotation doesn't specify an explicit use-site target,
previously it was added to both, the primary constructor value parameter
and the property in the FIR. Then, in FIR2IR, only the "correct" one was
added to the IR. Move up the deduplication logic into the frontend.
^KT-56177 Fixed
This is mostly a revert of 2f61a2f56f
There, we erroneously assumed that we may take captured types as equal
if they are based on the same-typed projections.
Each instance of capturing defines its own captured type,
that should not be equal to any other type captured in other place.
Initial motivation was brought by FP Ultimate, where a piece of code
from the new test was found that started working differently after
recent changes.
The most obvious consequence is the change in addAllProjection.fir.kt:
one cannot use an instance as an argument when expected type
is captured type based on the same instance.
Otherwise, it would lead to CCE if we allowed to put arbitrary charsequences
to the list that initially was a MutableList<String>
All other test data changes (but addAllProjection.fir.kt and differentCapturedTypes.kt)
are irrelevant and will be fixed in the subsequent commits
Namely, do not choose `Nothing?` result type when fixing a variable
that has other constraints besides the ones that came from
the relevant type parameter's upper bounds.
See more details in KT-55691.
In K1, the case from specialCallWithMaterializeAndExpectedType.kt
was working (inferred to String?) just because the branches
were analyzed independently with `String?` expected type.
This change became necessary after the previous commit when we united
inference subsystems for if/when branches (see motivation there).
NB: For K1, the behavior is left the same, but the code
was refactored a bit.
^KT-55691 Fixed
^KT-56448 Fixed
Some of the changed tests may duplicate other existing diagnostics,
but that should not be reason not to report them at all.
There might be another job to be done to avoid diagnostic duplications
For example, NEW_INFERENCE_NO_INFORMATION_FOR_PARAMETER
It became especially relevant after 0e84bf2053
that together with later commits bring a lot of unnecessary
NEW_INFERENCE_NO_INFORMATION_FOR_PARAMETER diagnostic
Passing `EXTENSION_RECEIVER` when processing `noReceiver`
looks like a mistake in general. This change is backed
by the `hidesMembers` and
`memberWithHidesMemberAnnotationVsMemberWithout` tests.
The exact reason with `memberWithHidesMemberAnnotationVsMemberWithout`
is that it first checks `@HidesMembers` candidates,
only takes the `kotlin/collections/Iterable<T>.forEach`,
but then yields `InapplicableWrongReceiver`,
because `explicitReceiverKind = EXTENSION_RECEIVER`
(which is strange, because we really don't have an explicit receiver).
Then we visit the same scope once more (now for all candidates)
and take 2 functions:
- `kotlin/collections/Iterable<T>.forEach`
- `kotlin/sequence/Sequence<T>.forEach`
...and they both result in `RESOLVED`,
because this time `explicitReceiverKind = NO_EXPLICIT_RECEIVER`.
This change ensures the first candidate we see
while checking `@HidesMembers` is taken as `RESOLVED`.
^KT-55503 Fixed
Alexander Udalov