^KT-59074 Fixed
This solution is not ideal. Ideally, the allopen compiler plugin
shouldn't report `private` properites as `open` KT-64980, but it will
unpredictably break other things.
This fixes some type argument mismatch errors caused by a captured type
being approximated and then captured again.
Some places need to be adapted to work with captured types that
previously only worked with approximated types.
#KT-62959 Fixed
Add test for other collections with (add/remove)(First/Last) methods. Add test for LinkedHashMap.put(First/Last) methods (they are also appeared in Java 21)
This test had the IGNORE_FIR2IR_EXCEPTIONS_IF_FIR_CONTAINS_ERRORS
directive enabled. This prevented some diagnostics from showing up
in this test, because there was this exception thrown in FIR2IR:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: IrSimpleFunctionPublicSymbolImpl for
/foo|foo(){}[0] is already bound:
FUN name:foo visibility:public modality:FINAL <> () returnType:kotlin.Unit
a0ba878b1d disabled the
`linkViaSignatures` flag in JS tests, which also fixed the exception.
Because of that, the full pipeline could be run, and the diagnostics
started to appear, which is the correct behavior.
Not that this only concerns _tests_, not production code, because
in the production pipeline `linkViaSignatures` had been disabled even
before that change.
While reporting a diagnostic there seems to be correct because the
parameter type is ConeErrorType, the former fact is a bug
in PCLA that should be fixed soon
Previously, error types on those implicit parameters were being lost.
Changed test data is only partly here
(only parts that are considered to be correct).
Other ones (new green-to-red changes) should belong to the next commit
and will be fixed soon (as a part of PCLA).
^KT-59938 Fixed
Review: https://jetbrains.team/p/kt/reviews/13760
After this patch:
> The /compiler/testData/diagnostics/tests/multiplatform/topLevelFun/conflictingImplDeclarations.kt test:
Fixed
> The /compiler/testData/diagnostics/tests/multiplatform/headerClass/expectDeclarationWithWeakIncompatibilities.kt test:
Declarations are in the same module. `PACKAGE_OR_CLASSIFIER_REDECLARATION` is reported anyway
> The /compiler/testData/diagnostics/tests/multiplatform/java/varPropertyAgainstJavaGetterAndNonFinalField.kt test:
Expect-actual matcher doesn't match fields in K2 https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-63667 => green code
> The /compiler/testData/diagnostics/tests/multiplatform/java/propertyAgainstJavaPrivateFieldAndPublicMethod.kt test:
Expect-actual matcher doesn't match fields in K2 https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-63667 => green code
> The /compiler/testData/diagnostics/tests/multiplatform/java/implicitJavaActualization_multipleActuals.kt test:
K2 doesn't have implicit Java actualization. And PACKAGE_OR_CLASSIFIER_REDECLARATION is reported anyway
> The /compiler/testData/diagnostics/tests/multiplatform/java/propertyAgainstJavaPublicFieldAndPublicGetter.kt test:
Expect-actual matcher doesn't match fields in K2 https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-63667 => green code
> The /compiler/testData/diagnostics/tests/multiplatform/actualClassifierMustHasTheSameMembersAsNonFinalExpectClassifierChecker/injectContextReceiverOverload.kt test:
Context receivers are not supported in expect-actual matcher. https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-61447
And K2 reports another error right now anyway
^KT-58765
Now that JDK 21 was released as stable, we can remove separate test
configurations for testing the compiler with JDK 21 and reintegrate
the corresponding test data into standard test configurations.
It was decided to leave this code as is, because supporting
it would probably require introducing Implication-statements,
but this is not a good-enough use-case for such work.
Before this change `ARGUMENT_TYPE_MISMATCH` would complain that
`Y` "is not a subtype of" `Inv<Y>`, because the function would only
check immediate bounds of the type parameter `Y`. `chosenSupertype`
would be `X`, not `Inv<out kotlin/String>`.
^KT-60056
The thing is, in a box test there is a proper
`UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE` on `M2().a.m2()` in K1 as well,
but it's not present in diagnostic tests. And also,
there's no error in the Kotlin IntelliJ plugin when
viewing such code.
It looks dangerous, but since this code is about
classes with identical fqNames, and since nothing
sus is really compiled, we can probably ignore this
problem. It's unlikely that it impacts much.
`invoke()` function of functional types is always defined
in such a way that its explicit receiver comes as the first
value parameter. Extension-function types contain the very
same `invoke` function, they just additionally have the
`@ExtensionFunctionType` annotation.
In the related test there is such an `invoke` function and
in the presented call its explicit receiver is the anonymous
function `fun Int.() = 1` itself. So the safe-checked `1`
^KT-60056
Make sure SENSELESS_COMPARISON
is absent in this case.
^KT-64089 Obsolete
Merge-request: KT-MR-13754
Merged-by: Nikolay Lunyak <Nikolay.Lunyak@jetbrains.com>
It started failing because of other
changes having been merged right before it
^KT-64644 Fixed
Merge-request: KT-MR-13755
Merged-by: Nikolay Lunyak <Nikolay.Lunyak@jetbrains.com>
Java resolving subsystem requires calculated visibility for correct disambiguation of supertypes.
But visibility remains `Unknown` for Kotlin class-like declarations during supertypes resolving because `STATUS` resolve phase is performed after `SUPER_TYPES` phase.
To fix the problem, the visibility should be initialized to public at the FIR building phase if no modifier is presented.
^KT-64127 Fixed
anzhela.sukhanova