Removing nullability directives from the methods of anonymous classes
affects some bytecode listing tests, but the changes will take effect
only after the advancing of the bootstrap compiler version.
See ^KT-62044
These two tests are now failing with IR fake override builder because
e.g. the fake override `MyMutableList.foo` has two overridden symbols:
`MyList.foo` and `MyMutableCollection.foo`, as opposed to the normal K2
mode which only has the former.
This seems to only affect the printed IR dump. Note that in K1 there
were two overridden symbols as well.
^KT-57858 Fixed
Remove FirEmptyOverridesBackwardCompatibilityHelper since it's not used anymore
Remove overridesMemberWithPlatformDependent.kt test file since it becomes redundant
This is needed because in order to figure out which declarations are
visible from anonymous objects in terms of overridability (see
`FirVisibilityChecker.isVisibleForOverriding`), we need to get the
package name of that anonymous object, because there's package-private
visibility on JVM.
#KT-62017 Fixed
`FakeOverrideBuilder.provideFakeOverrides` recursively changes overrides
for all superclasses in the hierarchy, including lazy IR, which is a lot
of extra work.
Also it leads to some tests failing in the IR fake override builder mode
because it changes correct fake overrides of Java classes to incorrect
ones. Those tests are unmuted but it doesn't mean they are fixed -- most
likely we'll generate fake overrides via IR for lazy IR too, at which
point they'll start to fail again.
Fake overrides created by K1, as well as fir2ir in K2, use DEFINED. So
this gets rid of a lot of differences in IR text dumps between the K2
normal mode and K2 with IR fake overrides, and will ultimately help in
implementing and testing KT-61360.
The change in AddContinuationLowering is needed to fix tests like
kt47549. When creating anonymous classes for SAM implementations, we're
reusing the same fake override building machinery. And since we can't
extract any meaningful information from the fake override parameter's
origin anymore, we have to get the parameter from the original symbol.
See the comment at updateSubstitutedMemberIfReceiverContainsTypeVariable
It became necessary after delegate inference is rewritten, since before
that happened, stub types were being left there and FIR2IR handled
them accidentally properly because stub types are equal to anything.
But that wasn't really correct even there because stub types are not
intended to leak out of the FIR
^KT-61060
The main idea is getting rid of stub types and using just type variables
See more detailed description at docs/fir/delegated_property_inference.md
The problem with stub types is that they need really special treatment
in many places, and on the other hand, there are no clear contracts on
how they should work (that regularly leads to bugs like KT-59529)
^KT-61060 Fixed
^KT-61075 Fixed
^KT-61077 Fixed
^KT-59529 Fixed
^KT-61633 Related
^KT-61618 Related
^KT-61740 Related
^KT-59107 Related
^KT-61747 Related
^KT-61077 Related
^KT-61781 Related
Optimization in 2439c22ff6 introduced an array `absentArguments` with
default values of all parameter types, which is copied in `callBy`
instead of being recomputed each time. Unfortunately, its size was
computed incorrectly: `maskSize` should only take into account
value parameters (see the `parameter.kind == KParameter.Kind.VALUE`
check in `callBy`).
This led to an issue where if the function had 32 * N value parameters
and 1 receiver parameter, `maskSize` was greater by 1 than expected,
which caused an exception due to mismatching argument array sizes.
#KT-61304 Fixed
In order to properly analyze top-level property initialization, a
control-flow graph must be created for FirFiles. This change adds the
foundation for the file CFG and updates body resolve to create the CFG.
Checking the CFG for proper initialization is separated into a following
change to ease code review.
KT-56683
fixup! Fix `isKotlinFunctionWithBigArity` function
Fix `isKotlinFunctionWithBigArity` function
Previous implementation could return false positive results, e.g. for
class named `abacaba.kotlin.Function42`
^KT-61548: Fixed
Merge-request: KT-MR-11928
Merged-by: Vladislav Grechko <Vladislav.Grechko@jetbrains.com>
The only case when erasure matters in a context of materialization of
`PromisedValue` is when the type is a type parameter which upper bound
is an inline class. Since `PromisedValue::materializeAt` is a hot spot
and `eraseTypeParameters` is an expensive operation, we should not do
type erasure in other cases.
Roman Efremov