This fixes some cases where we infer some type variable inside one
of the branches to Nothing instead of the expected type because Nothing
appeared in some other branch.
Specifically, we add an equality instead of a subtype constraint during
completion of calls to synthetic functions for if/when, try and !!.
We don't do it when the call contains a (possibly nested) elvis or is
inside the RHS of an assignment.
Otherwise, we would prevent some smart-casts.
#KT-65882 Fixed
If there is an expression receiver, we should process constructors only
of inner classes. Constructors of nested classes can be called only
on classifier
^KT-65333 Fixed
This is an addition to d4278250e6. Apparently we still need to produce
a new fake override for each inherited static member, because otherwise
we would try to determine the most specific return type, maximum
visibility, etc, all of which makes no sense for static members.
#KT-66152 Fixed
This diagnostic is reported in rare situations when
StubTypeForBuilderInference is kept as a parameter type
of for loop or lambda. Before this commit, we had in K1
"Could not load module <error module>" from IrLinker instead.
Related to: KT-52757, KT-53109, KT-63841, KT-64066
#KT-53478 Fixed
Usually we create synthetic property in java class if there is a property
from the base kotlin class and getter/setter with a corresponding name
in the declared scope or one of supertype scopes. But there is a case,
where the same supertype contains both property and getter:
```
// FILE: Base.kt
open class Base {
open val b = "O"
@JvmName("getBJava")
fun getB() : String = "K"
}
// FILE: Derived.java
public class Derived extends Base {}
```
In this case we shouldn't create synthetic property, because `getB()`
function is invisible for `Derived` class
^KT-66020 Fixed
The problem was that in K2 for some top-level script declarations we
need to add a dispatch receiver parameter (because frontend do not
assign any, but representing script as a class requires it to be the
script class) and at the same time, calls to these declarations rely on
properly set dispatch receiver parameter.
The simplest solution found is to have an additional traversal on the
relevan top-level declarations and assigning the dispatch receiver,
before running the main transformation.
#KT-64502 fixed
It should have been already implemented as intrinsic in all backends.
Do not test enumEntries intrinsic in the old JVM BE.
KT-53154
Co-authored-by: Alexander Udalov <alexander.udalov@jetbrains.com>
The previous one was incorrect for K1 since parent of top-level function
is `IrClass`, not `IrPackageFragment`.
The change is non-functional, K1 still worked correctly, but had to do
some extra work when inlining `emptyArray` calls and produces less
performant bytecode.
In some cases we transform flexible type into non-flexible during
enhancement, but don't add `@EnhancedNullability` attribute to them,
which breaks consistency with K1 on IR level
This commit fixes it
^KT-65302
A class can inherit two declarations that are compatible from the
overridability standpoint and are therefore combined to a non-trivial
intersection.
At the same time, the class can declare a member declaration that
only overrides one of the intersection's members.
In this case, we break up the intersection and only add the overridden
parts to the declared member's direct overridden list.
If the class doesn't override the intersection, it exists as
intersection override, like before.
#KT-65487 Fixed
Kirill Rakhman