Catch all exceptions when deserializing metadata with an incompatible version
to prevent the compiler from failing on discovering incompatible classes on the
classpath. Note that this is not the perfect solution: any invariant may be
broken in the incompatible metadata and it may result in a later exception
Similarly to pre-release classes, load metadata for the class anyway and allow
the resolution to select it as the result and prohibit its usage in the end
with the special diagnostic reported in MissingDependencyClassChecker
After this change SAM adapters are being resolved in the same group
as members, thus their overload resolution happens simultaneously.
But in the case of overload resolution ambiguity try to filter out all
synthetic members and run the process again.
See the issue and new test for clarification
#KT-11128 In Progress
1) for all cases of misusing of JsModule report on JsNonModule as well
2) report about non-top-level declarations with JsModule/JsNonModule
3) report about JsModule/JsNonModule declarations inside file marked with JsModule/JsNonModule
4) report about usages of declarations not marked with both JsModule and JsNonModule from UMD module
'a<T>::foo' is reserved if 'a' is a simple name and can be resolved as an expression
(this can be extended to 'a.b.c<T>::foo' case, although that is rather hard to implement using PSI).
'a?::foo' is reserved if 'a' can be resolved as an expression.
Use "-Xno-check-impl" to suppress checking whether the platform declaration
implementation has the "impl" modifier.
Do not check presence of fake overrides from platform class in the impl class,
otherwise there would be a lot of errors about the fact that
equals/hashCode/toString are not marked with the "impl" modifier
When matching platform and impl classifiers, ensure that each declaration from
the platform class scope is present in the impl class scope.
Note that the presence of the 'impl' modifier is not checked yet
For each platform declaration, there must be at least one impl declaration in
the module with the compatible signature; similarly, for each impl declaration,
there must be at least one platform declaration with the compatible signature.
Note that currently the presence of the 'impl' modifier is not checked yet.
Also, the sad fact is that if you have platform and impl declarations which are
not compatible, you get two errors: on the platform delcaration and on the impl
declaration. This needs to be addressed as well
Because of incomplete infrastructure, introduce a few dirty hacks to make
diagnostic tests analyze the common code via DefaultAnalyzerFacade, and also
add common module sources to analysis of platform-specific modules.
Also do not render 'platform' declarations from platform-specific modules to
the .txt file, since they are very likely to be exact copies of the same
declaration in the common module (see RecursiveDescriptorComparator)
E.g. 'impl typealias Foo<A, B> = Bar<A, B>' is allowed; everything else
(variance, changing order of parameters, etc.) is pretty much disallowed.
This is done for simplicity: otherwise matching the platform/impl class scopes
would be not so straightforward
Do not report "unused parameter" for parameters of platform declarations. Do
not allow platform class constructors to have val/var parameters or have an
explicit delegation call to another constructor. Do not allow platform classes
to have 'init' blocks.
Also suppress the "supertype not initialized" error for platform classes: the
supertype should be initialized in the impl class
Also add a new capability for ModuleDescriptor, which is used to obtain the
platform in the multi-platform scenario in tests.
Suppress the following errors for platform functions: "function has no body"
and "nothing to inline". Also do not report redeclaration between platform and
non-platform functions because this is the case when the common +
platform-specific code are analyzed together.
Note that some diagnostics reported in tests are not yet implemented in this
commit, they appear in subsequent commits
Fixed KT-14939: use expected receiver type when generating receiver code in get/set methods for bound property references.
Otherwise we have VerifyError for bound receiver 'null' of type 'Nothing?', which is mapped to 'java.lang.Void'.
TODO: proper equality comparison for property accessors ('x::prop.getter', 'x::prop.setter').
Mikhael Bogdanov