In Kotlin 1.1 and before, there were no nullability assertions on
extension receivers, because receiver is resolved with NO_EXPECTED_TYPE.
So, if an expression of platform type is passed as an extension receiver
to a non-private function, it would fail with IllegalArgumentException.
However, if the function is private, then we generated no parameter
assertions under assumption that such function can be called from Kotlin
only, and all arguments are checked on the call site. Thus 'null' could
propagate indefinitely.
In Kotlin 1.2, we do the following:
- Generate nullability assertions for expression receivers.
NB nullability assertions are stored for ReceiverValue instances, not
for expressions: given expression can act as receiver in different
calls, each with an expected receiver type of its own.
- Generate nullability assertions for extension receivers of private
operator functions.
NB it still can throw NPE for some particular "optimized" cases, but at
least those nulls would not propagate indefinitely.
This behavior is disabled by an "advanced" command-line option
'-Xno-receiver-assertions'.
* Plugins for JS CLI compiler now can be loaded via -XPlugin option
* New extension point in project
* JS translator modified to accept synthetic declarations and call
extension.
* Some functions made public to create a small API
In the case the single parameter of override has `Integer` type instead
of `int` type (while in common case it would be just `int`)
See the comment inside forceSingleValueParameterBoxing for clarification
#KT-19892 Fixed
It's necessary for generic inline suspend as a codegen
for it uses binding slice SUSPEND_FUNCTION_TO_JVM_VIEW
to generate fake continuation parameter, so all the
descriptors that are used for body generation must be
obtained from the SUSPEND_FUNCTION_TO_JVM_VIEW
#KT-19528 Fixed
Draw a clear distinction between the referenced function's parameters
and the anonymous synthetic function's parameters (see the comment).
This will be useful in supporting advanced callable reference features
like KT-8834
FixStack transformation divides on phases:
- Fixing stack before break/continue
- Fixing stack for inline markers/try-catch blocks
After the first stage all ALWAYS_TRUE markers are replaced
with simple GOTO's and if we're skipping break/continue edges
we won't reach the code after while (true) statement.
At the same time it's fine to not to skip them in the second phase
as the stack for them is already corrected in the first phase
#KT-19475 Fixed
Note that this isn't fully correct, consider the following situation:
S : T, T : Any?
=> CS(S, T) = T, but for now it will be T?, which is reliable but not so specific as just T
Problem manifests when a class property name matches a companion object
property name, and class property is referenced in closure context.
#KT-19367 Fixed Target versions 1.1.5
Alexey Andreev