This is effectively a revert of
447c127036, which was an (incorrect) fix
for KT-22379.
The bug was that we've cleared data-flow info for assigned variables
*after* knowledge that loop condition if 'false' was applied (we can
claim that if loop has no jump-outs). Therefore, we broke smartcasts in
the innocent code like that:
var x: Int? = null
while (x == null) {
x = readPotentiallyNullableInt()
}
// x should be non-null here
Commit reverts that "fix" for 1.3.0 and postpones deprecation until 1.4
KT-22379 Open
KT-27084 Fixed
Return the destination array instead of the destination storage array
wrapped in a new unsigned array. The difference should be
indistinguishable, however in JS, where inline classes are not inlined yet,
it had resulted in an extra wrapper.
Intention: obtain lambda argument for some parent call,
then get that call (for the lambda argument) and map
the argument to the parameter.
Before the fix, we were getting call for inner element,
not for the lambda argument and as a result, there were exceptions.
#KT-26873 Fixed
The traditional Gradle/Java model assumes several configurations, which
are now deprecated, which are both `canBeConsumed = true` and
`canBeResolved = true`.
* compile, testCompile, etc.
* runtime, testRuntime, etc.
* default
These configurations need to somehow resolve correctly to an appropriate
platform-specific artifact when they contain an MPP library or project
dependency.
However, simply marking them with the Kotlin platform type attribute
would put these configurations under considerations during Gradle
variant aware depdendency resolution of project dependencies, which
in order would lead to ambiguity (e.g. `compile` vs `runtime` vs
`testCompile` vs ... vs `apiElements`).
To deprioritize these configurations during dependency resolution, we
mark them with a special attribute with a unique value in each project.
Given that the values are different in different projects, Gradle will
not choose a configuration marked by this attribute.
But we still need 'project(path: '...', configuration: '...')`
dependencies to work, and so, instead of rejecting those different
values of the attribute, we say that all values are compatible, but
when an ambiguity arises, choose the configurations not marked by this
attribute, so effectively eliminating them from resolution.
Issue #KT-27111 Fixed
Dmitry Savvinov