This leads to type ref referring to generic type variables being
serialized correctly.
When the type variable is declared on the member itself, it's written to
typeParameterName,
otherwise it's written to typeParameter. This is required for
deserialization to work correctly.
#KT-63227 Fixed
Frontend may leak captured types into type arguments, so they should be
approximated before using them in fir2ir cast inserter to determine
a specific type from smartcast
^KT-62863 Fixed
This commit handles situations when some annotation in deserialized code
has an empty array literal argument [] or even non-empty [something].
Before this commit, we tried to guess a type of this array by "resolving"
the relevant annotation class and looking into the corresponding
parameter. Sometimes it can work, but also it can provoke recursive
resolve e.g. when the annotation class is a nested class in the same scope.
In this commit we changed the behavior in the following way:
- first, for non-empty array literals in deserialized code we just
take the array type from the corresponding array literal element
- second, for empty array literals we no more try to "guess" anything.
Instead we approximate array type as Array<Any>, and later at FIR2IR
stage we use the corresponding parameter type instead. At FIR2IR stage,
everything is already resolved and problems with recursions are no more
possible.
#KT-62598 Fixed
Before this commit, we first tried to guess a type of array literal
in deserialized annotation (it's a strange heuristics which can
lead to SOE and maybe not needed at all, see KT-62598, KT-62929),
and then, if unsuccessful, took the type from the first literal element,
if any. Since the second heuristic is much more clear, safe, and
understandable, in this commit they were swapped.
This commit does not fix KT-62598 in general case,
but decreases a set of cases when it can occur to
empty array literals only.
See the commented line at the end of the added test.
Delegated callables in FIR are session-dependant (as fake-overrides),
so it's incorrect to use their FIR as a key for declaration storage.
Pair of original function and owner lookup tag should be used instead
^KT-62671 Fixed
When files from different IrModules are merged in IrActualizer
their IrModule link was not updated. This led to assuming them
as different modules, and incorrect internal visibility handling.
^KT-62623
In Kotlin subclasses of `MutableCollection<Int>`, the method
`remove(Int)` has its argument boxed, so that it wouldn't clash with the
method from `java.util.List`. So `JavaOverrideChecker` should understand
that a Java method `boolean remove(java.lang.Integer)` overrides it,
otherwise platform declaration clash was reported.
The code is adapted from `forceSingleValueParameterBoxing` in K1's
`methodSignatureMapping.kt`.
The test has been moved and adapted from diagnostic to codegen box
tests, to check correct backend execution + runtime.
#KT-62316 Fixed
^KT-57858 Fixed
Remove FirEmptyOverridesBackwardCompatibilityHelper since it's not used anymore
Remove overridesMemberWithPlatformDependent.kt test file since it becomes redundant
This is needed because in order to figure out which declarations are
visible from anonymous objects in terms of overridability (see
`FirVisibilityChecker.isVisibleForOverriding`), we need to get the
package name of that anonymous object, because there's package-private
visibility on JVM.
#KT-62017 Fixed
See the comment at updateSubstitutedMemberIfReceiverContainsTypeVariable
It became necessary after delegate inference is rewritten, since before
that happened, stub types were being left there and FIR2IR handled
them accidentally properly because stub types are equal to anything.
But that wasn't really correct even there because stub types are not
intended to leak out of the FIR
^KT-61060
The main idea is getting rid of stub types and using just type variables
See more detailed description at docs/fir/delegated_property_inference.md
The problem with stub types is that they need really special treatment
in many places, and on the other hand, there are no clear contracts on
how they should work (that regularly leads to bugs like KT-59529)
^KT-61060 Fixed
^KT-61075 Fixed
^KT-61077 Fixed
^KT-59529 Fixed
^KT-61633 Related
^KT-61618 Related
^KT-61740 Related
^KT-59107 Related
^KT-61747 Related
^KT-61077 Related
^KT-61781 Related
Optimization in 2439c22ff6 introduced an array `absentArguments` with
default values of all parameter types, which is copied in `callBy`
instead of being recomputed each time. Unfortunately, its size was
computed incorrectly: `maskSize` should only take into account
value parameters (see the `parameter.kind == KParameter.Kind.VALUE`
check in `callBy`).
This led to an issue where if the function had 32 * N value parameters
and 1 receiver parameter, `maskSize` was greater by 1 than expected,
which caused an exception due to mismatching argument array sizes.
#KT-61304 Fixed
fixup! Fix `isKotlinFunctionWithBigArity` function
Fix `isKotlinFunctionWithBigArity` function
Previous implementation could return false positive results, e.g. for
class named `abacaba.kotlin.Function42`
^KT-61548: Fixed
Merge-request: KT-MR-11928
Merged-by: Vladislav Grechko <Vladislav.Grechko@jetbrains.com>
Mikhail Glukhikh