Attributes are used to name continuation classes and are generated
before inline classes processing. During the processing, for override
functions in inlined classes, the compiler generates
STATIC_INLINE_CLASS_REPLACEMENT function with body of the override.
The override's body is replaced with delegating call to
STATIC_INLINE_CLASS_REPLACEMENT. However, since we need to keep the name
of the continuation class, we copy attributes from the override to
STATIC_INLINE_CLASS_REPLACEMENT. This leads to attribute clash during
AddContinuationLowering.
So, to fix the issue, do not use the attribute of
STATIC_INLINE_CLASS_REPLACEMENT in original->suspend map.
As an optimization, do not generate continuation for the override
function.
Since LocalDeclarationsLowering is a BodyLoweringPass, local
functions inside one declaration are handled independently of local
functions in the other declaration. This can lead to name clashes, in
case a local function with the same name and signature is declared in
overloads in the same container, which results in a signature clash
error in JVM IR.
The issue became more common with the introduction of adapted function
references, where psi2ir generates a local adapter-function with a
predefined name, which can easily clash with another reference to the
same target in an overload. This led to a compilation error when
bootstrapping Kotlin with JVM IR, for example in GradleIRBuilder.kt
where there are a lot of references to the same function.
The reason for this is that this flag is used right now in 'cli-common'
to workaround the problem that this module is compiled with API version
1.4, but runs with stdlib of version 1.3 (bundled to Gradle). The same
problem would appear with adapted function references, since we use
kotlin/jvm/internal/AdaptedFunctionReference in the bytecode, only
available since 1.4.
The fix is to generate adapted references in this case as subclasses of
the already existing kotlin/jvm/internal/FunctionReference. This can
change behavior in some extreme corner cases (because such references
can now be observed to have reflection capabilities), but it's an -X
argument anyway.
Another option would be to introduce another compiler argument
specifically for this, but it looks like it would only complicate things
without much benefit.
This fixes the problem in JVM IR backend which didn't pass bound
receiver value of an adapted function reference to the superclass
(kotlin/jvm/internal/AdaptedFunctionReference), which caused equals to
work incorrectly on such references (see changes in box tests).
Previously, bound adapted function reference was represented as
IrFunctionExpression to an adapter function which calls the callee. The
value of the bound receiver in that case could only be found in the body
of that adapter function. This is not very convenient, so this change
makes psi2ir produce a block of the adapter function + reference to it.
The bound receiver value is then found in the reference. This is
basically similar to what ProvisionalFunctionExpressionLowering is doing
for all function expressions. And since this IR structure is already
supported in FunctionReferenceLowering, the problem in the JVM IR is
fixed without any additional modifications.
However, inliners do not support this IR structure yet, see KT-38535 and
KT-38536.
since they are broken on JDK 11: they change Field.modifiers, which is prohibited
since JDK 9, because this private field is not exported.
Thus, we need to split the test into two: one with assertions enabled and the other
one with them disabled. Also, we need to run them in separate processes, for them
not to interfere each other.
#KT-27176 Fixed
Class.getClassLoader returns null for classes loaded by the system class
loader (the one used to start the application). In this case we need to
use ClassLoader.getSystemClassLoader. We already have an extension
`safeClassLoader` specifically for this purpose in reflection.jvm, but
forgot to use it in d59f2bcc80.
#KT-37707 Fixed
This fixes the weird cases when a class gets overwritten by an imperfect
copy, reduces the number of classes in the output if an inline function
contains an inline call that causes it to have regenerated anonymous
objects, and makes inlining of same module functions a bit faster in
general. On the other hand, this may increase memory footprint a bit
because classes cannot be flushed to the output jar, as the inliner
would not be able to locate classes for anonymous objects if they have
already been unloaded from memory.
Steven Schäfer