Consider a function `run2` that has 2 lambda arguments called in place.
We don't know the order in which they're called, so here:
var x: Any? = something
run2(
{ x = null },
{ x as String },
)
// <--
it's not correct to simply `&&` the statements together, as that would
produce `x is Nothing? && x is String && x is Any?`. Instead, statements
should be grouped by assignment first, and different groups are `||`-ed.
This means in the above example we now get `x is Nothing? || (x is Any?
&& x is String)` == `x is String?`.
For example:
foo(
// `if` joins A & B
if (condition)
run { ... } // A
else
run { ... }, // B
run { ... } // C
) // `foo` unifies `A & B` and `C`, so if it is not resolved itself,
// further `if`s, `when`s, safe calls outside it, etc. continue
// building the correct type predicate until the next completed
// call.
^KT-44512 Fixed
In DeserializedClassDescriptor and MemberDeserializer, only the
`contextReceiverTypeList` field was used, and not
`contextReceiverTypeIdList` which is used when `-Xuse-type-table` is
enabled. The convention is to use a bunch of utilities declared in
`protoTypeTableUtil.kt` which deal with both methods of reading types.
Also, simplify the deserialization code in FIR (which was correct for
some reason).
If we want to analyse some function's call, we need to know about its
contracts, otherwise resolving the following code would be broken.
Computing return type of function is a prerequisite to using it in any
sensible way, so it's the best place to resolve it to CONTRACTS
KT-50733
class JavaSuperClass {
// members impls with special signature, but it doesn't override any Kotlin specials
}
class KotlinInterface {
// special members
}
class JavaSubClass extends JavaSuperClass implements KotlinInterface {
// we should obtain members from JavaSuperClass with their Kotlinish
// signature, not the Java one
}
That issue might be fixed via changing
TypeVariableMarker.shouldBeFlexible at ConeConstraintSystemUtilContext
but this and some other tricks have been added because of incorrect
handling of constraints where type variable has a flexible bound
^KT-51168 Fixed
Symbols might be from other modules, so we need to use corresponding
`FirSession`s; otherwise it would be impossible to query symbols
from `firProvider`
^KTIJ-21714 Fixed
If the session is from the other module, it might not know about
FirFiles which are relevant for transforming and resolving the
declaration
^KT-52136 Fixed
In qualified expression like `foo().`, selector expression is null.
Because of that the whole expression was marked as an error FIR
expression, and `foo()` part was not resolved at all (including
arguments and everything else).
This commit fixes the problem by providing receiver's FIR expression
as an underlying expression for error FIR expression. That way
it will be seen by all resolve transformers and will be successfully
resolved.
^KTIJ-21484 Fixed
* Change 1.6 to 1.7 constants
* Fix SAFE_CALL_WILL_CHANGE_NULLABILITY for testData
* Change EXPOSED_PROPERTY_TYPE_IN_CONSTRUCTOR_WARNING to EXPOSED_PROPERTY_TYPE_IN_CONSTRUCTOR_ERROR
* Change NON_EXHAUSTIVE_WHEN_STATEMENT to NO_ELSE_IN_WHEN
* Fix testData for SafeCallsAreAlwaysNullable
* Change T -> T & Any in test dumps
* Change INVALID_CHARACTERS_NATIVE_WARNING -> INVALID_CHARACTERS_NATIVE_ERROR
* TYPECHECKER_HAS_RUN_INTO_RECURSIVE_PROBLEM_WARNING -> TYPECHECKER_HAS_RUN_INTO_RECURSIVE_PROBLEM_ERROR
Previously (few commits earlier), it contained two versions
of receiver (lhs) generated separately for each desugaring version
that looked a bit redundant.
Now, at FIR building stage we just don't create desugaring sub-trees,
instead they are being built during bodies transformation and that seems
to be much convenient there, since we don't need to reverse-engineer
get-set-operator version to check if containing calls are successful
(as we just built those calls and retain them)
Semantically, this changes may only change how data flow works
for such statements (see changed compatibilityResolveWithVarargAndOperatorCall.kt)
^KT-50861 Relates
Before this commit we took just first intersection member for this check.
However it's quite bad, because we were dependent on supertype order.
Choosing the most specific member looks more consistent here.
#KT-50969 Fixed
Ilya Chernikov