For example, NEW_INFERENCE_NO_INFORMATION_FOR_PARAMETER
It became especially relevant after 0e84bf2053
that together with later commits bring a lot of unnecessary
NEW_INFERENCE_NO_INFORMATION_FOR_PARAMETER diagnostic
^ KTIJ-24385
Temp property to store receiver is generated for `a.b++` expression.
If this property's psi corresponds to receiver expr, then FirProperty
would be found by mapper if receiver is requested.
It works unexpectedly, because FirProperty is normally not expected by expression.
This change set fake sources for generated FirProperty, so it won't be found
by source psi
ensure fir annotations are included in FirDanglingModifierList and resolved,
dedicated DanglingTopLevelModifierListStructureElement exists for top
level lists only, class level lists are processed by containing structure
element
k1 would suggest `get` as well
but with current fir structure with fake desugaring
get is moved to the separate fake psi which doesn't exist
thus the problem is ignored for now
^ KTIJ-24025
Previously, statuses of superclass which are not local was not ignored
Sometimes it worked in the IDE by calling lazyResolveToPhase
which is a violation of the lazy resolution contract
^KT-54890
Before, BODY_RESOLVE phase were used for them but status may be unresolved.
This caused CCE on accessing resolved status for such static enum members.
Now, those declarations are created with the status of owning enum as the status is taken from that class.
See: compiler/testData/asJava/lightClasses/
AnnotatedParameterInInnerClassConstructor.kt
The muted tests don't work with the (KT-53371, KT-53519)-related
changes. During this test happens an attempt to access unresolved
annotations via CustomAnnotationTypeAttribute.
Discussion: KTIJ-23547
Right now it is the easiest way to ensure that all the parameters are
resolved. After KT-53573 is fixed, we might use `resolvedReturnTypeRef`
on each parameter individually instead
Also, add `toString` implementation to `ValueClassRepresentation`
classes, so they are properly rendered in testdata
^KTIJ-22630 Fixed
Before this commit, we added Enum.entries only in case when
LanguageFeature.EnumEntries was ON (with an exception in K1/Java case).
In this commit we add Enum.entries unconditionally, and in case
the language feature is OFF we filter them out during tower resolve.
If we want to analyse some function's call, we need to know about its
contracts, otherwise resolving the following code would be broken.
Computing return type of function is a prerequisite to using it in any
sensible way, so it's the best place to resolve it to CONTRACTS
KT-50733
Ilya Kirillov