Header/impl declarations are now considered fully compatible even in the
case when the impl declaration has no "impl" modifier. The error about
no "impl" is now reported separately and only on the impl declaration,
never on the header declaration
#KT-20087 Fixed
- Tell user what exactly is not supported (e.g., local inline function)
- Reduce diagnostics range to a keyword or an identifier
where appropriate
#KT-16223 Fixed Target versions 1.1.50
Otherwise, when completing all the unsuccessfull candiates,
resolution of each lambda-arguments starts repeatedly for each candidate
that leads to exponential time
NB: Changes in `completeArguments` are necessary because otherwise
nested lambdas will be analyzed twice:
once for the main resolved call, and then for all candidates
that again leads to exponential complexity
#KT-16672 Fixed
#KT-19457 Fixed
Note that the quick fix to implement header class works incorrectly when
that class has nested classes at the moment; this should be fixed
separately
#KT-15494 Fixed
#KT-18573 Fixed
Also support a quick fix to add 'impl' modifier (KT-18454), although it
doesn't work yet on classes because there's no error on them in the IDE
#KT-18087 Fixed
#KT-18452 Fixed
#KT-18454
Try to report most of the errors on the actual members of the impl
class. In many cases, there's a 1:1 mapping of header to impl class
members, so the error "some members are not implemented" on the class
declaration itself is redundant. Exceptions include functions/properties
from supertypes (there may be no other place to report a signature
mismatch error in this case), functions/properties not marked with
'impl' (the checker is only run for declarations explicitly marked with
'impl') and default constructors (the checker is not run for them)
#KT-18447 Fixed
Try to report most mismatch errors on the 'impl' declaration. Only
report a mismatch error on the 'header' declaration if no error would be
otherwise reported on any 'impl' declaration in the compilation unit.
Also render declaration kind in the message
#KT-18447 In Progress
This happens when we resolve bounds for type parameters, causing wrong
UPPER_BOUND_VIOLATED to be reported on type parameter whose bounds were
not resolved yet.
#KT-19601 Fixed Target versions 1.1.5
Zalim Bashorov