- Mangle names for extension receivers in lambdas
- Correctly mark anonymous variables and variables for arguments
for destructuring declaration.
There is one failure remaining which is cause by lambda
type inference differences that leads to FIR having an explicit
return from the lambda whereas old frontend leads to an implicit
return. This difference is visible in debug stepping that the
local variables tests do because the implicit return has the line
number of the closing brace of the lambda. This change adds an
IrText test to make the difference clear.
Parameter of a synthetic SAM adapter always has a function type (not a
subtype). Checking for the subtypes broke the case from KT-46908, where
fun interface is itself a subtype of a function type.
#KT-46908 Fixed
Note that resulting SAM method
public final method accept(p0: java.lang.Object): void
has a signature less specific than the resulting bridge method
public synthetic bridge method accept(p0: X): void
Anastasiya Shadrina