ASM has logic that splits exception tables in MethodWriter.computeAllFrames:
// Loop over all the basic blocks and visit the stack map frames that must be stored in the
// StackMapTable attribute. Also replace unreachable code with NOP* ATHROW, and remove it from
// exception handler ranges.
...
firstHandler = Handler.removeRange(firstHandler, basicBlock, nextBasicBlock);
...
https://gitlab.ow2.org/asm/asm/issues/317867
#KT-28546 Fixed
Proper SMAP support for default values from expect declarations is required.
Default value in expect declaration could has line number that
exceed line count in actual file that causes an error
#KT-23739 Fixed
#KT-29174 Open
In 1.3.0 there was introduced KT-28061 bug, which caused some of the
NO_RETURN_IN_FUNCTION_WITH_BLOCK_BODY diagnostics to be lost (turning
"red" code into "green")
500dc11514 fixes the bug and returns
lost diagnostics back. This commit adds additional information for some
of the cases where diagnostics were list and then brought back (for the
user sanity).
The heuristic used for detecting cases which need additional information
is simple: if function has return in in-place called lambda, and
NO_RETURN_IN_FUNCTION_WITH_BLOCK_BODY should be reported, then we
enhance it with additional information.
^KT-28061 Fixed
Main test data (testName.txt) a not totally valid cause of IDEA-205039.
Javac test data (testName.javac.txt) a not valid
cause of type annotations support absence.
Runtime tests are disabled cause reflection support absence.
Introduce lowering phase that turns !!exp -> exp for the boolean
'not' builtin. This makes sure that code such as
```
if (!!!!!booleanValue) {
doStuff()
}
```
generates only one branch.
Original problem is that lowered ir closures doesn't meet inliner expectations
about captured variable position in inlining method.
E.g.: Call 'foo(valueParam) { capturedParam }' to
inline function 'foo' with declaration
inline fun foo(valueParam: Foo, inlineParamWithCaptured: Bar.() ->) ....
is reorganized through inlining to equivalent call foo(valueParam, capturedParam1, cp2 ...).
But lowered closure for lambda parameter has totally different parameters order:
fun loweredLambda$x(extensionReceiver, captured1, cp2..., valueParam1, vp2...)
So before inlining lowered closure should be transformed to
fun loweredLambda$x(extensionReceiver, valueParam1, vp2..., captured1, cp2..)
#KT-28547 Fixed
In general case parameter type could differ from actual default lambda type.
E.g.: fun inlineFun(s: (Child) -> Base = { a: Base -> a as Child}),
where type of default lambda is '(Base) -> Child'.
In such case we should find somehow actual invoke method in bytecode knowing
only name, number of parameters and that's actual invoke is non-synthetic
regardless of bridge one.
#KT-21946 Fixed
Laziness works no more in this tests after dummyContextProvider is removed
for script light classes (see fix of KT-25395).
However, now 2/2 script light classes tests still fail in IDE mode,
because after fix of KT-26505 IDE light classes do not see
ScriptTemplateWithArgs as super-class
For the inline class:
```
inline class IC(val x: Int)
```
Type (IC..IC?) should be mapped to the wrapper `IC`
because it can hold object and also because it does so for primitives
#KT-28983 Fixed
Mikhael Bogdanov