Unbound it from implicit receiver stack as it only needs scope structure/declaration nestedness
Semantics for protected has been changed in a way it works in old FE
NB: We should report additional diagnostic in case of CallCompanionProtectedNonStatic.fir.kt
(see KT-38814)
In case of IrFunctionReference with type SuspendFunction (no K!) there
was a misalignment between the base class (Any) and the
origin (LAMBDA..). As a result the SuspendFunctionLowering was
getting confused and produced hanging code.
Before this commit we considered !isOverride as a sign that
function / field / accessor has no overridden symbols.
However, it's false for deserialized, because isOverride
is always false there.
This commit fixes 68 BB tests but breaks 25 BB tests (not yet muted)
Attributes are used to name continuation classes and are generated
before inline classes processing. During the processing, for override
functions in inlined classes, the compiler generates
STATIC_INLINE_CLASS_REPLACEMENT function with body of the override.
The override's body is replaced with delegating call to
STATIC_INLINE_CLASS_REPLACEMENT. However, since we need to keep the name
of the continuation class, we copy attributes from the override to
STATIC_INLINE_CLASS_REPLACEMENT. This leads to attribute clash during
AddContinuationLowering.
So, to fix the issue, do not use the attribute of
STATIC_INLINE_CLASS_REPLACEMENT in original->suspend map.
As an optimization, do not generate continuation for the override
function.
Instead of generating these annotation classes as package-private on
JVM, serialize their metadata to the .kotlin_module file, and load it
when compiling dependent multiplatform modules.
The problem with generating them as package-private was that
kotlin-stdlib for JVM would end up declaring symbols from other
platforms, which would include some annotations from package
kotlin.native. But using that package is discouraged by some tools
because it has a Java keyword in its name. In particular, jlink refused
to work with such artifact altogether (KT-21266).
#KT-38652 Fixed
Since LocalDeclarationsLowering is a BodyLoweringPass, local
functions inside one declaration are handled independently of local
functions in the other declaration. This can lead to name clashes, in
case a local function with the same name and signature is declared in
overloads in the same container, which results in a signature clash
error in JVM IR.
The issue became more common with the introduction of adapted function
references, where psi2ir generates a local adapter-function with a
predefined name, which can easily clash with another reference to the
same target in an overload. This led to a compilation error when
bootstrapping Kotlin with JVM IR, for example in GradleIRBuilder.kt
where there are a lot of references to the same function.
comparisons.
Having those conversions leads to unnecesary boxing and null checks.
This change does it only for JVM in the optimization lowering. It
is unclear to me if the other backends can get away with something
similar.
Mark Punzalan