After an accidental change in 846537b367, we started generating metadata
into anonymous classes for callable references. This metadata contained
the Kotlin representation of the referenced function. In KT-53794, this
led to a problem where Java's protected visibility could not be
represented in Kotlin terms, which crashed the backend.
But also, this metadata is useless because there's no real use case for
interpreting it (since you already have a function reference object at
runtime with all the needed information), so it would take some extra
space in the bytecode.
#KT-53794 Fixed
Right now it is the easiest way to ensure that all the parameters are
resolved. After KT-53573 is fixed, we might use `resolvedReturnTypeRef`
on each parameter individually instead
Also, add `toString` implementation to `ValueClassRepresentation`
classes, so they are properly rendered in testdata
^KTIJ-22630 Fixed
It's reported on receivers in extension function calls with stub type,
as such calls can shadow members of finalized stub types causing
change of resolve when corresponding type argument specified explicitly
It works by checking extension receiver during call resolution parts run
That way we can easily detect if we found an extension applicable to
stub receiver and report call diagnostic for it
KT-53739
Let's call builder lambdas (BL) a lambda that has non-fixed input type
projection at the moment of lambda arguments analysis, such lambdas
is a subject to be analyzed with builder inference
Due to bug in constraint system joining algorithm, currently system
of two or more such lambdas may lead to unsound type inference
Diagnostic added here should be reported in case when there are two
BL that shares a common constraint system, while not annotated with
@BuilderInference, as a protection against aforementioned bug
It's reported by ConstraintSystemCompleter when such situation has
occurred during builder inference phase, it is the same place that
decides wherever lambdas is subject to builder inference or not
KT-53740
Review: https://jetbrains.team/p/kt/reviews/6753
Meaningful semantic change was splitted into 5 commits to simplify the
change review. Sinle commit would be too big.
Why replace source to binary: to get rid of kotlin-reflect in Kotlin
plugin artifact KTIJ-22276
Note: Kotlin Maven artifacts (./gradlew publish) changed their
dependency on kotlin-reflect
Review: https://jetbrains.team/p/kt/reviews/6753
Why: I'm going to replace source dependency on kotlin-reflect with
binary dependency. Normalize reflect dependency before global
processing.
Review: https://jetbrains.team/p/kt/reviews/6753
All redundant I managed to find, of course.
Why: I'm going to process all reflect dependencies in the next commits.
Cleanup reflect dependency before processing.
They are redundant because:
1. if `compileOnly` then compilation didn't break after dropping the
dependency
2. if `test*` then tests didn't break after dropping the dependency.
3. `analysis/analysis-api-fir/analysis-api-fir-generator/build.gradle.kts`
`compiler/fir/checkers/checkers-component-generator/build.gradle.kts`
Drop `implementation(project(":kotlin-reflect-api"))` because the
module already depends on
`implementation(project(":kotlin-reflect"))`
4. `compiler/daemon/daemon-client/build.gradle.kts`. Drop `runtimeOnly`
because after dropping `compileOnly` compilation didn't break (so
`runtimeOnly` looks suspicious). Less safe than 1-3
Review: https://jetbrains.team/p/kt/reviews/6753
This commit doesn't fix any issue except for "cleanup". If you find a
mistake in this commit feel free to revert part of it/the whole commit
I checked every module where I drop ':dist' dependency. Tests still pass
in those modules
Dmitriy Novozhilov