Namely, do not choose `Nothing?` result type when fixing a variable
that has other constraints besides the ones that came from
the relevant type parameter's upper bounds.
See more details in KT-55691.
In K1, the case from specialCallWithMaterializeAndExpectedType.kt
was working (inferred to String?) just because the branches
were analyzed independently with `String?` expected type.
This change became necessary after the previous commit when we united
inference subsystems for if/when branches (see motivation there).
NB: For K1, the behavior is left the same, but the code
was refactored a bit.
^KT-55691 Fixed
^KT-56448 Fixed
Otherwise, it leads to branches inference run fully independent,
while there are cases when it's necessary to flow type information from
one of the branch to another (see the new test).
NB. In K1, it worked differently: if branches were inferred altogether
only for Any/Any? expect types (otherwise they're analyzed independently)
See foo2/foo4 in the test.
To avoid breaking change we need to support foo1/foo3, but we're trying
not to have some special rule for Any, so we've got a new resolution mode
that provides expect type, but doesn't require full completion.
^KT-45989 Fixed
^KT-56563 Fixed
^KT-54709 Related
For change in specialCallWithMaterializeAndExpectedType.kt
At first, see at KT-36776
Long time ago, it's been decided that if/when resolution
should look similar to similar "select()" calls,
but it's a breaking change (see KT-36776), and we were ready for that back then.
But then, there were too many broken cases found, thus we reverted it at
100a6f70ca
But probably, it would be better to try to infer `String?`
instead of `Nothing?` (see next commits)
Note that change in specialCallWithMaterializeAndExpectedType.kt
will be addressed in later commits, too
Implicit type might have two meaning there:
- noExpectedType
- unknown declaration type where this expression is assigned to
For both cases, we've got ResolutionMode.ContextIndependent that works
just fine
When expected type is known, use it as expected type for branch bodies.
While it indeed becomes different from the usual select call resolution,
where expected type is applied only after completion starts,
it helps to support, e.g. callable references resolution just as powerful
as it was in K1.
Also, in some cases where diagnostics have been changed, they become
a bit more helpful since they are reported closer
to the problematic places
cannotCastToFunction.kt test has been removed because it relied
on the case erroneously supported by the hack removed from
the FirCallResolver in this commit.
^KT-45989 Fixed
^KT-55936 Fixed
^KT-56445 Fixed
^KT-54709 Related
^KT-55931 Related
Beside some corner cases, it's already prohibited in K1 because
adaptation have a bit strange nature
(they don't represent any existing real function exactly)
^KT-55137 Fixed
Some of the changed tests may duplicate other existing diagnostics,
but that should not be reason not to report them at all.
There might be another job to be done to avoid diagnostic duplications
For example, NEW_INFERENCE_NO_INFORMATION_FOR_PARAMETER
It became especially relevant after 0e84bf2053
that together with later commits bring a lot of unnecessary
NEW_INFERENCE_NO_INFORMATION_FOR_PARAMETER diagnostic
- Add IrPluginContext to JvmBackendContext, so plugin intrinsics can
reference external functions properly.
- Do not use module.findClassAcrossModuleDependencies as Descriptor API does not work for FIR.
- Add asm listing tests in serialization plugin for K2
- Remove Delegated.kt asm listing test as we have similar test in boxIr group.
#KT-56553 Fixed
The dependency signature may refer to function type interface properties
(e.g. name) or methods. It is impossible to detect (without hacks)
which binary symbol for loading is required. However, when loading
a property or a method the entire function type interface is loaded.
And vice versa, a loading of function type interface loads
properties and methods as well. Therefore, load the top level signature only,
it must be the signature of function type interface.
^KT-56582 Fixed
* Fix objects in inline functions and lambdas:
* Add common lowerings used in K/JS and K/Native
* Fix inline lambda call detection logic in presence of additional casts
Merge-request: KT-MR-8791
Merged-by: Svyatoslav Kuzmich <svyatoslav.kuzmich@jetbrains.com>
This flag is true by default but is set to false for
- Java methods and constructors
- interface delegation methods that delegate to Java
The NAMED_ARGUMENTS_NOT_ALLOWED logic is mostly refactored to use the
new flag though some custom logic remains for determining the correct
message and to work around a corner case with fake overrides.
The flag is (de)serialized from/to metadata. For backward compatibility
with K1, delegated methods to Java types are deserialized as stable.
^KT-40480 Fixed
Support importing synthetic declarations from "magic" forward
declaration packages:
- cnames.structs
- objcnames.classes
- objcnames.protocols
So this is a rough equivalent to the forward declarations module
made of ForwardDeclarationsPackageFragmentDescriptor in K1.
Unlike K1 implementation, this K2 one doesn't allow importing
a declaration that wasn't actually forward-declared in a C/Objective-C
header available through a cinterop klib dependency.
This inconsistency is present due to not using the `// WITH_STDLIB`
in the above tests. When K1 creates the enum, it tries to generate
`entries()`, and for that it tries to load `kotlin.enums.EnumEntries`,
but this is actually an unresolved reference. K1 silently swallows it,
and proceeds.
The reason K2 doesn't fail is that in order to generate `entries()` it
simply creates the necessary `ConeClassLikeType` with the desired
`classId` instead of loading the whole `ClassDescriptor`.
The reason we can still observe `$ENTRIES` and `$entries` in K1
is because they are generated during the JVM codegen, and it
only checks if the `EnumEntries` language feature is supported. It
doesn't check if the `entries` property has really existed in IR
(by this time it's expected to have already been lowered to the
`get-entries` function - that's why "has ... existed").
The reason why the codegen doesn't fail when working with
`kotlin.enums.EnumEntries` is because it creates its
own `IrClassSymbol`.
^KT-55840 Fixed
Merge-request: KT-MR-8727
Merged-by: Nikolay Lunyak <Nikolay.Lunyak@jetbrains.com>
Denis.Zharkov