- KT-62895 cannot be reproduced on the Analysis API side. Still, it is
useful to add tests here for better coverage in the future.
- The reason is likely that Analysis API tests specifically use
`SealedClassesInheritorsCaclulatorPreAnalysisHandler` to compute
sealed class inheritors (which are usually the breaking point for
problems in `when` exhaustiveness checking), so the tests do not use
the production implementation. See KT-64505 for future work on this
problem.
^KT-62895
This way, even if the whole qualifier is not selected, but some of its
parts are, the reference shortener will correctly find and shorten
those parts
^KTIJ-28080 Fixed
Invocation of Logger.fatal() may cause severe side effects such as
throwing an exception or even terminating the current JVM process
(check various implementations of this function for details).
The code that uses Logger.fatal() sometimes expects a particular kind
of side effect. This is totally a design flaw. And it's definitely not
a responsibility of Logger to influence the execution flow of
the program.
In the 'IGNORE_SELF' mode, dangling files don't have their own
declarations in providers. As a result, all references there resolve to
declarations of the original file. It is conceptually similar to that we
had in on-air resolve, however, now it's possible to work with the whole
content of the in-memory 'FirFile'.
As it can be seen in 'ProjectStructureProvider.kt'
(KtFile.danglingFileResolutionMode), the 'IGNORE_SELF' mode is
automatically applied for non-physical files with an original file being
set. For other scenarios, now there is a new 'analyzeCopy()' function
that allows to pass the analysis mode explicitly.
Some components in Analysis API have the 'Impl' suffix both in test
and standalone environments. This commit fixes the logical ambiguity
for a project structure provider.
This commit introduces dangling file modules, which may be either
code fragments or ordinary Kotlin files. As before, code fragments are
analyzed against some context element, however ordinary files only
have a context module.
Code fragments can also have a dangling file module as a contextual one,
including other code fragment. This is done to support potential usages
in completion, intentions and refactorings.
Utilize `FirSamResolver` to obtain the potential SAM constructor
from the classifier
Also, accept K2_SYNTHETIC_RESOLVED in the `resolveUnqualifiedAccess`,
since this is the kind of resolve success which corresponds to the
SAM constructor call resolution
^KTIJ-28167 Fixed
This allows to properly report them as used in `KtFirImportOptimizer`
This change will also be important for properly fixing KTIJ-28167,
since `computeImportableName` is also used in reference shortener
^KTIJ-28385 Fixed
As it is more similar to production. Also, fixed scope search for klib.
Now we register main binary modules before to avoid duplication with
libraries from createLibrariesByCompilerConfigurators as now we can
have a declared library and regular sources
^KT-62888
^KT-62651
- This commit adds a `MODULE_KIND` directive to Analysis API tests which
can be used to change a test module's `KtModule` kind from the default
determined by the test's registered `KtModuleFactory` (which in turn
depends on the `moduleKind` configured during test generation).
- The most important use case is the ability to have multi-module tests
where a main module references symbols from a binary library module.
This use case requires source configurations to compile libraries,
which requires additional setup. This will be implemented in a
following commit.
^KT-64468 Fixed
- The disposable passed to `getOrCreateApplicationEnvironment` should
not actually be the application environment's disposable, which is
created inside the function. Instead, it should be the project's
disposable, which is used to track how many projects still rely on the
shared application environment.
- This issue wasn't apparent before because there is no visible
consequence when an application isn't disposed after all projects have
been disposed (during tests). However, the solution for KT-63650
relies on application environments being disposed after all projects
are disposed, so that a new application environment with a different
configuration can be created. (Only one shared application environment
may be active at the same time.)
^KT-63650
Pavel Kirpichenkov