Strictly speaking, callable references are not calls. However, type
arguments are still inferred for references, and 'KtCall' is the only
place in Analysis API that exposes call-substituted types.
^KT-66485 Fixed
This previously worked on accident because the get call in an
augmented array assignment wouldn't have a resolved argument list, and
so `argumentsToSubstitutedValueParameters` would return null.
Now, we additionally verify that we're in a `set` call.
#KT-66124
It's not really necessary if the information about if the lambda was a
trailing lambda can be directly saved in FirAnonymousFunctionExpression.
Removing the FIR node uncovered a couple of bugs
(UNINITIALIZED_ENUM_ENTRY, ERROR_IN_CONTRACT_DESCRIPTION) that were
caused by assuming that a lambda is always a trailing lambda.
#KT-66124
If actual declaration is broken (missing explicit `actual` keyword),
expect declaration still makes sense.
This way, we allow refactorings on broken code
^KT-65191 fixed
- `LibraryBinary` should not contain any decompiled files, as we want
FIR symbols in tests to be provided from indexed stubs or class files,
but definitely not from decompiled PSI. This brings `LibraryBinary`
much closer to the behavior of binary libraries in the IDE.
- Some tests may still require access to a decompiled file, for example
when trying to test `getOrBuildFir` for some `KtElement` coming from a
library. This commit introduces `LibraryBinaryDecompiled`, which
does contain decompiled files.
- We don't really need `LibraryBinary` as a main test module kind
anymore, since tests generally want to access some main `KtFile`.
Hence, test configurators for `LibraryBinary` have been turned into
configurators for `LibraryBinaryDecompiled`.
- An alternative would be decompiling files on demand, but this is not
currently feasible because the Standalone API doesn't reconcile stubs
with decompiled PSI, like the IDE does automatically. (For the same
declaration, the stub and the PSI will have a different identity.) As
long as there is no support for this, we'll have to rely on a separate
test module kind.
^KT-65960
- `TestModule.explicitTestModuleKind` requires a directive to be present
to get the `TestModuleKind`. But we still want to find out the test
module kind for test modules without a directive. Hence, we have to
add this property to `KtTestModule` during its construction.
^KT-65960
- `KtModuleWithFiles` isn't actually used in a production Standalone API
context, but it was exposed via `analysis-api-standalone-base`. In
current production usages, the project structure is built with the
module builder DSL.
- Hence, `KtModuleWithFiles` is only relevant for tests. This commit
moves `KtModuleWithFiles` to the Analysis API test framework and
renames it to `KtTestModule`. This removes any risk that an outside
user could start using `KtModuleWithFiles` and completely uncouples
the test project structure from production APIs.
- In addition, we can add the `TestModule` to `KtTestModule`, allowing
tests to quickly access the original test module, for example to check
the test module kind.
- The commit also removes the data class status of `KtTestModule` and
`KtTestModuleProjectStructure` to avoid issues with destructuring when
properties are added or removed.
^KT-65960
- The configuration allows the test infrastructure to decide whether to
index binary libraries to stubs (when stub-based deserialized symbol
providers are used) or to skip indexing (when class file-based
deserialization is used).
- The information is needed in `AnalysisApiBaseTestServiceRegistrar`,
where the `KotlinStaticDeclarationProviderFactory` is created. This
service registrar shouldn't access `LLFirLibrarySymbolProviderFactory`
and so checking the library symbol provider factory wasn't an option.
- Another alternative was adding a property to
`AnalysisApiTestConfigurator`. However, this then requires passing the
property to `AnalysisApiBaseTestServiceRegistrar`, because it doesn't
have access to the configurator out of the box. This however goes
against the design of our service registrars, which generally only
access test services. So adding a test service seemed like the best
solution.
^KT-65960
The root cause of the exception is that we missed such an element, and
it led to unresolved declaration during iteration over file declarations
^KT-65562 Fixed
- The compiler's `SealedClassInheritorsProvider` should not be exposed
outside LL FIR, as it is an internal compiler component and also
exposes `FirRegularClass`. `KotlinSealedInheritorsProvider` is an
Analysis API provider for sealed inheritors that accepts a `KtClass`
instead.
^KT-64718 fixed
When encountering multiple available same named types,
resolve all of them together with corresponding extensions.
This aligns well with the current resolve behavior of classes
with the same name (see `SameNameClassesFromStarImports.kt`)
Also, add extra test for resolving the ambiguous type without
the extension function. The behavior is the same - resolve to the
both classes.
Make sure that, when ambiguous, both the package
and the callable/class/property are resolved from
KDoc reference.
Do a slight refactoring of `KDocReferenceResolver`
This behavior is also true for K1
Yan Zhulanow