Perform command line argument preprocessing in the beginning of
parseCommandLineArguments, so that argfiles are expanded in all
scenarios, not just when the compiler is invoked via
K2{JVM,JS}Compiler.exec
if assertions mode is not LEGACY.
This is done since assertions can be disabled (in both compile time and
runtime) and thus, the data flow info is not reliable anymore.
#KT-24529: Fixed
Previously, assert was just a regular function and its argument used to
be computed on each call (even if assertions are disabled on JVM).
This change adds support for 3 new behaviours of assert:
* always-enable (independently from -ea on JVM)
* always-disable (independently from -ea JVM)
* runtime/jvm (compile the calls like javac generates assert-operator)
* legacy (leave current eager semantics) - this already existed
Default behaviour is legacy for now.
The behavior is changed based on -Xassertions flag.
#KT-7540: Fixed
Arguments are passed in form '-XXLanguage:+LanguageFeatureName' for enabling
LanguageFeature.LanguageFeatureName, and '-XXLanguage:-LanguageFeatureName'
for disabling.
Note that they do override other settings, including 'language-version'
or extra ('-X') args.
This fixes LoadBuiltInsTest which failed because UnsafeVariance was
rendered in the lazy resolve result, but was not in the deserialized
result (because it has SOURCE retention)
Introduce COMMON_COROUTINES_TEST directive.
Every test with this directive is run twice: one time with
language version 1.2 and kotlin.coroutines.experimental package
and the other time with language version 1.3 and kotlin.coroutines
package. Each run is a separate method: with suffixes _1_2 and _1_3
respectively.
However, since codegen of release coroutines is not supported in JS
backend, we generate only one method: with suffix _1_2.
#KT-23362
Also, fix the value of "hasAnnotations" flag to reflect if there are any
_non-source_ annotations on a declaration.
Unfortunately, after this change
IncrementalJsCompilerRunnerTestGenerated$PureKotlin.testAnnotations
starts to fail because of the following problem. The problem is that
annotations on property accessors are not serialized yet on JS (see
KT-14529), yet property proto message has setterFlags field which has
the hasAnnotations flag. Upon the full rebuild of the code in that test,
we correctly write hasAnnotations = true, but annotations themselves are
not serialized. After an incremental build, we deserialize property
setter descriptor, observe its Annotations object which happens to be an
instance of NonEmptyDeserializedAnnotationsWithPossibleTargets. Now,
because annotations itself are not serialized, that Annotations object
has no annotations, yet its isEmpty always returns false (see the code).
Everything worked correctly before the change because in
DescriptorSerializer.hasAnnotations, we used Annotations.isEmpty and the
result was the same in the full rebuild and in the incremental scenario.
But now we're actually loading annotations, to determine their
retention, and that's why the setterFlags are becoming different here
and the test fails
#KT-23360 Fixed
Support DONT_RUN_GENERATED_CODE in JS Box tests.
IGNORE_BACKEND_WITHOUT_CHECK is removed because of
it's often wrongly used and in most cases can be
replaced with IGNORE_BACKEND or DONT_RUN_GENERATED_CODE
or with combination of them.
* add separate run function for each test class to simplify and deduplicate generated code
* move the code that process IGNORE_BACKEND directive to the separate function, outside of generated code.
** it reduces size and complexity of a generated code
** it allows to mute and unmute tests w/o regenerate tests
* add an ability to generate IGNORE_BACKEND directive automatically, it's disabled by default
* add an ability to remove IGNORE_BACKEND directive automatically, it's enabled by default
* remove whitelists
NB we use 'Intrinsics.areEqual(Double, Double)' and
'Intrinsics.areEqual(Float, Float)', because right now we take
nullability from the inferred type of the expression (which is 'Any?' in
the test cases).
We should probably reconsider this in case of more exact information
available from the data flow analysis, e.g., in case of
fun test(x: Any?) =
x is Serializable && x is Double? && x == 0.0
We statically know that 'x' is not null in 'x == 0.0' (although it's
neither nullability of it's numeric type 'Double?' nor the nullability
of the inferred type 'Any?').
There might be some edge effects in the performance related to byte code
size and preventive unboxing and so on.
Mikhael Bogdanov