These three methods are conflicting with existing extensions,
thus the behavior might be changed when switching to JDK 11
Probably, it's worth revisiting our strategy here,
e.g. by blacklisting all new methods in
#KT-24974 Fixed
Suspend functions and callable references to suspend lambdas are already
supported.
Support callSuspendBy of suspend function of big arity.
#KT-24854: Fixed
Avoid name clashes in cases such as
inline class Login(val login: String)
inline class Password(val password: String)
fun validate(login: Login) { ... }
fun validate(password: Password) { ... }
The design is to use `suspend fun` instead of coercion, just as suspend
lambdas.
However, this syntax is not supported in the parser. But this is not a
problem, since the coercion lead to internal compiler error.
As a workaround everybody uses suspend lambdas.
#KT-24860: Fixed
- Calling suspend functions is allowed
- Presence of suspend function type still makes declaration
unusable unless it belongs to a value parameter as a top-level type
containing less then three parameters
Still, warning should be emitted because they will become unsupported in 1.4
#KT-25683 In Progress
It is safe to treat DefaultValueArgument as UNKNOWN_COMPUTATION, because
default arguments can't break smartcasts.
Possibly, they can add new ones, but it can be supported later.
^KT-25278 Fixed
The order of types enumeration has been changed recently:
previously it was collected at first from a child and then from
its parent, but now it's being collected in order of appearance
`CONFLICTING_JVM_DECLARATIONS` diagnostics are reported because we're
trying to generate functions from `Any` once for inline class and
once for data class
#KT-25760 Fixed
Previously, enum entries were treated by the data-flow subsystem similar
to other class/singletons. As a consequence, calls like
'Enum.ENTRY.property' had IdentifierInfo of 'property'.
However, specially for enum entries, descriptor of 'property' is one and
the same for all entries. It means that from the data-flow point of
view, 'Enum.ONE.property' and 'Enum.TWO.property' are *one and the same
data-flow values*.
It could obviously lead to some bogus smartcasts, so this commit
introduces separate IdentifierInfo.EnumEntry and uses it to build proper
qualified values.
^KT-20772 Fixed
The source of testdata change is following commit from the
intellij-community repo:
d2bfe3d14bfa48af585f1faddc9a0c37dc05e724
It changes how Java-resolution resolves constructors:
- before, *any* PsiMethod without type reference was treated as
constructor
- now, PsiMethod without type reference is treated as constructor
only if their *names also match*
In particular, in this test, 'void () {}', surprisingly, doesn't have a
type reference ('void' is parsed as PsiErrorElement:Identifier
expected), its name is '<unnamed>', and its visibility is
'package-private' (!)
Therefore, previously we thought that 'Nameless' has package-private
constructor and were reporting INVISIBLE_MEMBER.
Now we don't see any constructor so we add default constructor, which has
public-visibility -> error is gone.
Note that this change affects behavior only when "red" code is already
present in the project (for "green" code, assumption "method without type
reference is a constructor" is indeed correct).
Before this commit, expect super-class without constructors did not
provoke SUPERTYPE_NOT_INITIALIZED. However, it should, but only
if sub-type is normal class (not an expect one).
So #KT-24597 Fixed
Mikhail Zarechenskiy