The problem arises when retrieveDirectOverriddenOf returns a
substitution override member. For such members, it is impossible to get
the first base member. For a correct result, it is required to find
originalForSubstitutionOverride for all substitutionOverrides.
#KT-64276 Fixed
This diagnostic is reported on an explicitly-declared function which
overrides a regular Java function with the same signature as a hidden
one from the same scope.
#KT-64846 Fixed
In this commit we started to create and process a hidden copy
for a built-in functions, which value parameters are erased in Java,
in case we have an accidental Java override which value parameters
are not erased.
In this situation attempt to override such a Java override in Kotlin
again will lead to inaccessible functions
(see changes in containsAndOverload.fir.kt)
#KT-64846 In Progress
^KT-62547 Fixed
I also tested the commit by disabling DfaBooleanVariables in all tests
and checking what tests will fail
I didn't find anything that worked in K1, but doesn't work in K2 with
DfaBooleanVariables disabled
Related tests:
- DiagnosticCompilerTestFirTestdataTestGenerated$Resolve$Smartcasts
- LLFirPreresolvedReversedDiagnosticCompilerFirTestDataTestGenerated$Resolve$Smartcasts
- PreFirIdeSpecTestGenerated$NotLinked$Dfa
- DiagnosticCompilerTestFE10TestdataTestGenerated$Tests$SmartCasts
- FirPsiDiagnosticTestGenerated$Resolve$Expresssions.testSyntheticSmartCast
Local properties defined within the body of a do-while loop can be used
in the condition of the loop. However, use of a `continue` may mean the
property isn't always initialized, even if it is initialized when it is
defined. So while a local property may be within scope and has an
initializer, this doesn't always mean that the property is initialized.
As such, properties that are defined within a do-while loop and also
used in the condition of the same do-while loop should be tracked. Then,
these properties should still be checked for proper initialization even
if they have an initializer.
^KT-64872 Fixed
When a type annotated with @PurelyImplements (explicitly or implicitly)
inherited some methods from a java supertype and the purely implemented
Kotlin supertype, it was inconsistent which of the signatures the
intersection override would have (with or without flexible types).
This commit adds support for the enhancement of intersection overrides.
If one of the overridden methods has non-flexible types, the enhanced
method will have non-flexible types.
This fixes some false negative nullability type mismatches.
#KT-59921 Fixed
This fixes a bunch of missing overridden symbols in IR.
This is also required for fixing KT-59921 in the following commit
where we need to keep all overridden symbols of intersection overrides
so that we can enhance them properly.
#KT-57300 Fixed
#KT-57299 Fixed
#KT-59921
#KT-57300
#KT-62788
#KT-64271
#KT-64382
Handle case with FirField properly. Previously the code was returning
STABLE_VALUE in that case.
Note that in fact the changed 'when' branch expects only FirJavaField,
as FirFieldImpl should be handled by FirBackingFieldSymbol-check at
the beginning of the method. However, it is impossible to refer to
FirJavaField directly due to module visibility
Enumerate all cases more carefully via exhaustive 'when',
it's more readable and will prevent potential issues in future in case
more subclasses are added.
^KT-58279 Fixed
If we encounter a declaration in the current module whose signature
is the same as that of a declaration in another module which we happen
to also reference from the current module, don't report any errors,
just like we don't do it in Kotlin/JVM. This leaves the user in the KLIB
hell situation, but this is intentional, because otherwise a legitimate
change like moving a declaration to another module and marking
the original one as `@Deprecated("", level = DeprecationLevel.HIDDEN)`
would lead to a error, and we don't want that.
Also, don't try to show the diagnostics on a declaration that doesn't
have an IrFile.
^KT-65063 Fixed
We drop Kotlin function 'remove' or 'getOrDefault' from JvmMappedScope,
if it has platform-dependent annotation, and the bound Java class scope
does not contain a function with the same signature.
#KT-57268 Fixed
When applying function contracts to arguments, make sure the argument
variable hasn't been reassigned within a lambda. Contracts can only be
applied to unchanged variables, otherwise outdated type statements could
be added to the variable.
^KT-63151 Fixed
Postponed lambdas introduce a host of challenges in data-flow analysis.
While inheriting type statements was disabled while these challenges are
being considered, we must still copy type statements from non-postponed
lambda edges. It seems the same is true for implications.
Implications are copied from previous flows when there is only a single
previous flow. That is because it never seemed to be required based on
test results. However, a recent test case revealed that copying is
required when there are multiple previous flows, but only one flow is
from a non-postponed-lambda node.
Combining implications from multiple non-postponed-lambda nodes did not
have an impact on test results, so until such a test case can be
created, the overhead of calculating common implications from multiple
flows will be avoided.
^KT-63351 Fixed
NB: in order to produce correct IR origins, the source element kinds for
some FIR elements has been changed. As a side effect, mapping PSI to FIR
slightly changed: namely, for `a[b]++`, `a[b]` used to be mapped on
`set` call or callable reference, but now it is mapped on `get` call.
^KT-61891: Fixed
^KT-64387: Fixed
This reverts commit bb6f466162.
Reverting the fix for KT-57417 as it causes failures in IntelliJ and
Space projects. May reintroduce fix after failures are investigated and
resolved.
When a property is implemented via class delegation, it should be
considered unstable for smart-casting. This is because it is unknown
what kind of stability the underlying class delegate property has. It
could be a stable property, or it could be implemented via a custom
getter and unstable.
^KT-57417 Fixed
In convertDestructingDeclaration, property delegates are mistakenly
treated as valid expressions for destructuring, but they should be
ignored.
#KT-65021 Fixed
- Move it out of the ContextDependent hierarchy
- Get rid of many controversial checks that were necessary because
Delegate was a ContextDependent inheritor
- Actually fix semantics for lambda processing
Previously, lambdas as delegate expression were not being analyzed
thus leading to an exception (see KT-64635), and this change
forces analyzing them in the same mode as ContextIndependent
(thus `{}` made by default `() -> Unit` leaving to DELEGATE_SPECIAL_FUNCTION_MISSING)
Before this change, new test was failing with an exception.
I've analyzed all `is ContextDependent` and it seems that none of them
is relevant to delegates.
^KT-64635 Fixed
Build failure was introduced by `9b786d35`,
where I forgot that typealiases exist.
^KT-64891
^KT-65336 Fixed
Merge-request: KT-MR-14087
Merged-by: Nikolay Lunyak <Nikolay.Lunyak@jetbrains.com>
K2 version runs like for 15s.
It became slow after PCLA (KT-59791) was implemented,
and the reasons for that is the presence of a lot of interconnected TV
which leads to O(NUMBER_OF_CONSTRAINTS*NUMBER_OF_VARIABLES)
asymptotic during constraint incorporation.
The test itself in any way doesn't represent some common BI use case,
so it seems reasonable to mute it temporary.
^KT-65005 Related
See callingOuterGenericClassConstructorWithSelfTypes.kt
Previously, for A<B>(""), we used substituted constructor
where `X` was substituted with `B` (or `A<X>.B`).
But when resolving the call for constructor, we use `X`
as a type variable of the call, thus in some positions
we used `X` as TV (Xv in the comments) and somewhere `X` as a type
parameter, thus leading to contradictions (see clarifying comment).
The idea of the fix is simply repeating of the regular (not delegated)
constructor call resolution:
- We substitute only type parameters of outer class
- All the declared parameters of the callee are being checked
through regular resolution & inference mechanisms.
NB: Diagnostic only being reported on arguments because there
when we add `String <: Any` constraint it fails due to existing
contradiction in the CS.
Without the argument/parameter the error is just being lost, but that's
a different story (seeKT-65224).
^KT-64841 Fixed
Although these dumps don't really show if
something is a `FirFunctionCall` or a
`FirImplicitInvokeCall`, they do show what
goes into the receiver, and what are value
arguments.
anzhela.sukhanova