The error occurs when completing the
call for the outer synthetic call
`ACCEPT_SPECIFIC_TYPE`. The error
is saved into the CS of this outer
candidate, which leads to its
callable reference to be an error
reference, but since such calls are
not parts of the FIR tree, we never
collect such errors.
^Fixed KT-59233
When BI/incomplete call is present in return argument, it will be
added to the main call-tree, leading to requirement violation in
`ConstraintSystemCompleter.getOrderedAllTypeVariables`
as after `FirBuilderInferenceSession.inferPostponedVariables` it will
be completed, and its type variables couldn't be found anymore
In K1, we actually do the same, but we are able to find type variables
of such calls due to architecture difference:
In K2, `getOrderedAllTypeVariables` uses FIR as the main source to
lookup
In K1, `getOrderedAllTypeVariables` uses resolution atom tree, where
candidate/CS of the call is still available after
`inferPostponedVariables`
In fact, all incomplete calls were analyzed in FULL mode according to
the contract of `FirBuilderInferenceSession.addPartiallyResolvedCall`.
Thus, it means we normally shouldn't add them to the main call-tree, but
accidentally do it as incomplete calls contain non-completed candidate
This particular commit addresses the problem partially, only
in cases when the expected return type for the lambda is Unit and when
the incomplete call is located in the last expression of the lambda
In such cases, we can skip the call from the last expression completely,
since all potential calls there were analyzed in FULL mode,
and couldn't introduce any useful info to the CS of the main call-tree
^KT-54294
Previously, when a candidate was found with an applicability that is
better than the current best applicability, all previous candidates were
thrown away. Now we keep them, unless the new applicability is
successful. If no successful candidates are found, we fully resolve all
the unsuccessful ones and select the ones with the least bad
applicability. This improves diagnostics for unresolved calls.
#KT-57844 Fixed
Before this commit, for property candidates in K2 their types wasn't
inferred/susbtituted properly.
So, when candidate for fooBar.liveLoaded.invoke() was created,
the type of `fooBar.liveLoaded` was just X type parameter for which
there is no any `bar()` functions in its member scope.
While proposed semantics is a bit different from K1, where
both property and invoke candidates are united into common system,
it doesn't contradict to the specification (https://kotlinlang.org/spec/overload-resolution.html#callables-and-invoke-convention)
which says explicitly that invoke-convention should be desugared as
`r.foo.invoke()`, thus `r.foo` should be completed independently.
Also, this strategy supports some reasonable use-cases like KT-58259
while it's still a breaking change but for more artificial-looking
situations (see KT-58260) and should be passed through
the language committee.
The changes in stubTypeReceiverRestriction* tests looks consistent
because of how `genericLambda` now works
(with full completion of property call).
NB: The code is going to be red once KT-54667 is fixed and also there's
already similar diagnostic in K1 (INFERRED_INTO_DECLARED_UPPER_BOUNDS)
^KT-58142 Fixed
^KT-58259 Fixed
^KT-58260 Related
The compiler should only report diagnostics for
comparisons over builtins and identity-less types,
other incompatibilities should be reported
via inspections.
It's ok that in `equalityChecksOnIntegerTypes`
instead of `EQUALITY_NOT_APPLICABLE_WARNING` we get
`EQUALITY_NOT_APPLICABLE`, because
`ProperEqualityChecksInBuilderInferenceCalls`
is already active by default.
This change also replaces the notion of a representative superclass
with the least upper bound.
This makes complex types like
intersection/flexible transparent to
RULES1-based compatibility checks.
One way to look at it is to think
that this is an automatic way of handling
type parameters: automatic picking of
"interesting" bounds, and checking them against one another.
Note that `TypeIntersector.intersectTypes`
for `Int` and `T` where `T` is a type parameter
may return both `{Int & T}` or `null`
depending on `T`-s bounds. At the same time,
for type parameters `T` and `K` it will
always return `{T & K}`.
`ConeTypeIntersector.intersectTypes`, on the
other hand, will always return `{Int & T}`
irrespectively of the bounds. Meaning, the two
intersectors differ in corner cases.
`lowerBoundIfFlexible` call in `isLiterallyTypeParameter` is backed by
the `equalityOfFlexibleTypeParameters` test.
^KT-35134 #fixed-in-k2
^KT-22499 #fixed-in-k2
^KT-46383 #fixed-in-k2
This change allows to revert adding `WITH_STDLIB` directive
to tests which happened at `a9343aeb`.
Co-authored-by: Alexander Udalov <Alexander.Udalov@jetbrains.com>
Some of the changed tests may duplicate other existing diagnostics,
but that should not be reason not to report them at all.
There might be another job to be done to avoid diagnostic duplications
- If too few or too many type arguments were provided, they were all
thrown away in `TypeArgumentMapping`,
`FirCallCompletionResultsWriterTransformer`, and `KtFirCallResolver`.
The fix handles type arguments of the wrong arity more gracefully.
- Note for `TypeArgumentMapping`: Excess type arguments are not needed
for candidate resolution. Excess type arguments are still resolved
due to the handling in `FirCallCompletionResultsWriterTransformer`.
- Post-processing in `AllCandidatesResolver`: When all candidates are
resolved in `AllCandidatesResolver.getAllCandidates`, the function
builds a FIR file. During that resolution, the
`generic<String, String>` call (in example
`functionCallWithTooFewTypeArguments.kt`) is correctly marked as
inapplicable, but the missing type argument is inferred as an error
type. `firFile` then contains a function call
`generic<String, String, ERROR>` instead of `generic<String, String>`.
This call is still marked as inapplicable. Despite that, the
*subsequent* resolution by
`bodyResolveComponents.callResolve.collectAllCandidates` disregards
the call's inapplicability and resolves successfully into an
applicable candidate. This is because `CandidateFactory` doesn't make
any guarantees for already inapplicable calls. The fix adds
post-processing to `AllCandidatesResolver` to preserve candidate
inapplicability.
- Most tests that this commit changes had slightly different results due
to type arguments becoming resolvable.
- `wrongNumberOfTypeArguments.kt` and
`wrongNumberOfArgumentsInTypeAliasConstructor.kt`:
`ConeDiagnostic.toFirDiagnostics` prefers specific errors. Because
`ARGUMENT_TYPE_MISMATCH` is specific and `INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE` is
not, only the former is reported. I see no reason to pass an illegally
typed argument in either test, so the change reduces the errors to
`INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE`.
- `typeAliasSamAdapterConstructors2.fir.kt`: See KT-55007.
- Disable `mismatchTypeParameters` JS backend test due to its handling
of excess type arguments. See KT-55250.
^KT-54980 fixed
It's reported on receivers in extension function calls with stub type,
as such calls can shadow members of finalized stub types causing
change of resolve when corresponding type argument specified explicitly
It works by checking extension receiver during call resolution parts run
That way we can easily detect if we found an extension applicable to
stub receiver and report call diagnostic for it
KT-53739
Let's call builder lambdas (BL) a lambda that has non-fixed input type
projection at the moment of lambda arguments analysis, such lambdas
is a subject to be analyzed with builder inference
Due to bug in constraint system joining algorithm, currently system
of two or more such lambdas may lead to unsound type inference
Diagnostic added here should be reported in case when there are two
BL that shares a common constraint system, while not annotated with
@BuilderInference, as a protection against aforementioned bug
It's reported by ConstraintSystemCompleter when such situation has
occurred during builder inference phase, it is the same place that
decides wherever lambdas is subject to builder inference or not
KT-53740
It leads to further infer type variable into those upper bounds which is forbidden
Substituted upper bounds is ok because specific substituted types came from constraints of other proper positions, or if specific substituted type is from declared upper bound too, then there should be another declared upper bound with no substitution
^KT-51464 Fixed
^KT-47986 Fixed
* Change 1.6 to 1.7 constants
* Fix SAFE_CALL_WILL_CHANGE_NULLABILITY for testData
* Change EXPOSED_PROPERTY_TYPE_IN_CONSTRUCTOR_WARNING to EXPOSED_PROPERTY_TYPE_IN_CONSTRUCTOR_ERROR
* Change NON_EXHAUSTIVE_WHEN_STATEMENT to NO_ELSE_IN_WHEN
* Fix testData for SafeCallsAreAlwaysNullable
* Change T -> T & Any in test dumps
* Change INVALID_CHARACTERS_NATIVE_WARNING -> INVALID_CHARACTERS_NATIVE_ERROR
* TYPECHECKER_HAS_RUN_INTO_RECURSIVE_PROBLEM_WARNING -> TYPECHECKER_HAS_RUN_INTO_RECURSIVE_PROBLEM_ERROR
In this commit we upgrade FIR builder inference logic from
the compiler version to 1.7. FIR-based compiler now works with
"don't use builder inference" flag always ON and supports switching
the flag "use builder inference only if needed". To do it,
ContraintSystemCompleter (FIR) and KotlinConstraintSystemCompleter (FE 1.0)
are made similar with extracting some common parts into
ConstraintSystemCompletionContext.
Test status: one BB test fails after this commit (KT-49285).
Also we have a crush in DFA logic in FIR bootstrap test and somehow
questionable behavior in FIR diagnostic test. However,
two BB tests were fixed, the 3rd case from KT-49925 were also fixed.
#KT-49925 Fixed
We are going to deprecate `WITH_RUNTIME` directive. The main reason
behind this change is that `WITH_STDLIB` directive better describes
its meaning, specifically it will add kotlin stdlib to test's classpath.
Nikolay Lunyak