Now, we detect clashing signatures during serialization to KLIB and
report a compiler error if two or more declarations have the same
`IdSignature`
For example, for the following code:
```kotlin
@Deprecated("", level = DeprecationLevel.HIDDEN)
fun foo(): String = ""
fun foo(): Int = 0
```
the compiler will produce this diagnostic:
```
e: main.kt:1:1 Platform declaration clash: The following declarations
have the same KLIB signature (/foo|foo(){}[0]):
fun foo(): String defined in root package
fun foo(): Int defined in root package
e: main.kt:4:1 Platform declaration clash: The following declarations
have the same KLIB signature (/foo|foo(){}[0]):
fun foo(): String defined in root package
fun foo(): Int defined in root package
```
Note that we report this diagnostic during serialization and not earlier
(e.g., in fir2ir) for more robustness, so ensure that we check
exactly the signatures that will be written to a KLIB.
If we later introduce some annotation for customizing a declaration's
signature (e.g., for preserving binary compatibility), this
diagnostic will continue to work as expected.
^KT-63670 Fixed
Add test for other collections with (add/remove)(First/Last) methods. Add test for LinkedHashMap.put(First/Last) methods (they are also appeared in Java 21)
To separate interop modules to different packages,
.def files should be treated similarly to .kt files:
1) package directive should be prepended with test-specific synthetic package,
or, if, absent, package directive with synthetic package should be added.
2) in .kt files, import directives and fully-qualified import from interop modules
should be prepended with same test-specific synthetic package.
This test had the IGNORE_FIR2IR_EXCEPTIONS_IF_FIR_CONTAINS_ERRORS
directive enabled. This prevented some diagnostics from showing up
in this test, because there was this exception thrown in FIR2IR:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: IrSimpleFunctionPublicSymbolImpl for
/foo|foo(){}[0] is already bound:
FUN name:foo visibility:public modality:FINAL <> () returnType:kotlin.Unit
a0ba878b1d disabled the
`linkViaSignatures` flag in JS tests, which also fixed the exception.
Because of that, the full pipeline could be run, and the diagnostics
started to appear, which is the correct behavior.
Not that this only concerns _tests_, not production code, because
in the production pipeline `linkViaSignatures` had been disabled even
before that change.
While reporting a diagnostic there seems to be correct because the
parameter type is ConeErrorType, the former fact is a bug
in PCLA that should be fixed soon
Previously, error types on those implicit parameters were being lost.
Changed test data is only partly here
(only parts that are considered to be correct).
Other ones (new green-to-red changes) should belong to the next commit
and will be fixed soon (as a part of PCLA).
It affects the `is IrGetField` check in
TypeOperatorLowering.computeNotNullAssertionText, which leads to missing
NPE messages when accessing backing fields of public properties.
#KT-64615
^KT-59938 Fixed
Review: https://jetbrains.team/p/kt/reviews/13760
After this patch:
> The /compiler/testData/diagnostics/tests/multiplatform/topLevelFun/conflictingImplDeclarations.kt test:
Fixed
> The /compiler/testData/diagnostics/tests/multiplatform/headerClass/expectDeclarationWithWeakIncompatibilities.kt test:
Declarations are in the same module. `PACKAGE_OR_CLASSIFIER_REDECLARATION` is reported anyway
> The /compiler/testData/diagnostics/tests/multiplatform/java/varPropertyAgainstJavaGetterAndNonFinalField.kt test:
Expect-actual matcher doesn't match fields in K2 https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-63667 => green code
> The /compiler/testData/diagnostics/tests/multiplatform/java/propertyAgainstJavaPrivateFieldAndPublicMethod.kt test:
Expect-actual matcher doesn't match fields in K2 https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-63667 => green code
> The /compiler/testData/diagnostics/tests/multiplatform/java/implicitJavaActualization_multipleActuals.kt test:
K2 doesn't have implicit Java actualization. And PACKAGE_OR_CLASSIFIER_REDECLARATION is reported anyway
> The /compiler/testData/diagnostics/tests/multiplatform/java/propertyAgainstJavaPublicFieldAndPublicGetter.kt test:
Expect-actual matcher doesn't match fields in K2 https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-63667 => green code
> The /compiler/testData/diagnostics/tests/multiplatform/actualClassifierMustHasTheSameMembersAsNonFinalExpectClassifierChecker/injectContextReceiverOverload.kt test:
Context receivers are not supported in expect-actual matcher. https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-61447
And K2 reports another error right now anyway
^KT-58765
Now that JDK 21 was released as stable, we can remove separate test
configurations for testing the compiler with JDK 21 and reintegrate
the corresponding test data into standard test configurations.
This was never semantically correct, but was not important
before KT-63644, as they were immediately dropped after that anyway.
After KT-63644, they were used to compute fake overrides inside them,
which were later matched against actual class, which can
produce false-positive matching errors.
^KT-64835
It was decided to leave this code as is, because supporting
it would probably require introducing Implication-statements,
but this is not a good-enough use-case for such work.
Before this change `ARGUMENT_TYPE_MISMATCH` would complain that
`Y` "is not a subtype of" `Inv<Y>`, because the function would only
check immediate bounds of the type parameter `Y`. `chosenSupertype`
would be `X`, not `Inv<out kotlin/String>`.
^KT-60056
Sergej Jaskiewicz