This commit changes the behavior of KT-59138 effectively declining it in 2.0.
However, we plan to implement KT-59138 behavior under a feature
flag in 2.0 (see KT-66447), and switch this feature on version 2.x.
Also, this commit implements the LC resolution about postponing
KT-57014 change. We don't have KT-57014 described behavior in 2.0 anymore.
However, we plan to implement a deprecation warning here, see KT-65578.
After this commit, 6 diagnostic tests become incorrectly broken:
- 5 tests from PurelyImplementedCollection group
- a test platformTypes/nullableTypeArgument.kt
This commit also breaks currently fixed-in-k2 KT-50134
(it is fixed again in the following commits),
as well as KT-58933 (it will remain not fixed till we enable KT-59138
behavior again).
#KT-65596 In Progress
#KT-57014 In Progress
#KT-58933 Submitted
If some java class has multiple supertypes then we need to collect
overriddens from all those types directly, even if superTypeScope
(which is FirTypeIntersectionScope in this case) returns only
one symbol from one of this types (not intersection one)
This is needed to proper enhancement in cases when some type occurs
multiple times in supertypes graph with different nullability
of arguments:
class ConcurrentHashMap<K, V> : AbstractMap<K!, V!>, MutableMap<K, V>
If we try to find method `get(key: K): V` supertype scope returns
`AbstractMap.get(key: K!): V!` (because it actually overrides
`MutableMap(key: K): V?`), but we need to get both symbols to
properly enhance types for `ConcurrentHashMap.remove`
Because those test are single Java files, many of them use a top-level
class as a container for multiple classes to be tested. Such tests do
almost nothing if those nested classes aren't handled.
- Add utilities to add new attribute to ConeAttributes
- Get rid of FlexibleNullability attribute (it can be easily inferred
for any flexible type at any moment)
- Fix determining of EnhancedNullability attribute
Really, this commit implements early J2K mapping for all Java types.
It's questionable and probably wrong at least for super-types,
because, for example, we cannot resolve spliterator() in classes
derived from java.lang.Iterable
Java nullability annotations may generate types that currently are not denotable in Kotlin:
class Java {
void <F> foo(@NotNull F f) {}
}
Type of given value parameter should be not nullable under any substitution:
String/String?/String! because of annotation contract.
NB: Currently there is no full analogues for such types in pure kotlin
Denis.Zharkov