11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nikolay Lunyak 88ff93df7f [FIR] Check is for impossibility
^KT-58203 Fixed
^KT-62646
2024-03-08 15:37:44 +00:00
Nikolay Lunyak f0720c1d12 [FIR] Fix K2 behavior according to RULES1
The compiler should only report diagnostics for
comparisons over builtins and identity-less types,
other incompatibilities should be reported
via inspections.

It's ok that in `equalityChecksOnIntegerTypes`
instead of `EQUALITY_NOT_APPLICABLE_WARNING` we get
`EQUALITY_NOT_APPLICABLE`, because
`ProperEqualityChecksInBuilderInferenceCalls`
is already active by default.

This change also replaces the notion of a representative superclass
with the least upper bound.
This makes complex types like
intersection/flexible transparent to
RULES1-based compatibility checks.
One way to look at it is to think
that this is an automatic way of handling
type parameters: automatic picking of
"interesting" bounds, and checking them against one another.

Note that `TypeIntersector.intersectTypes`
for `Int` and `T` where `T` is a type parameter
may return both `{Int & T}` or `null`
depending on `T`-s bounds. At the same time,
for type parameters `T` and `K` it will
always return `{T & K}`.

`ConeTypeIntersector.intersectTypes`, on the
other hand, will always return `{Int & T}`
irrespectively of the bounds. Meaning, the two
intersectors differ in corner cases.

`lowerBoundIfFlexible` call in `isLiterallyTypeParameter` is backed by
the `equalityOfFlexibleTypeParameters` test.

^KT-35134 #fixed-in-k2
^KT-22499 #fixed-in-k2
^KT-46383 #fixed-in-k2
2023-03-31 15:01:50 +00:00
pyos 6a2d74e211 FIR DFA: generate type implications on all null comparisons 2022-11-22 15:44:28 +00:00
Denis.Zharkov 2ecba6ac39 Remove WITH_NEW_INFERENCE directive from all tests
This directive anyway does not make test run twice with OI, and with NI
It only once run the test with specific settings (// LANGUAGE)
and ignores irrelevant (OI or NI tags)
2021-05-25 13:28:26 +03:00
Tianyu Geng 7bb81ef157 FIR: add equality call checker
Added checker for FirEqualityOperatorCall. It's surfaced as one of the
following diagnostics depending on the PSI structure and types under
comparison:

* INCOMPATIBLE_TYPES(_WARNING)
* EQUALITY_NOT_APPLICABLE(_WARNING)
* INCOMPATIBLE_ENUM_COMPARISON_ERROR

Comparing with FE1.0, the current implementation is more conservative
and only highlights error if the types are known to follow certain
contracts with `equals` method. Otherwise, the checker reports warnings
instead.

However, the current checker is more strict in the following situations:
1. it now rejects incompatible enum types like `Enum<E1>` and
  `Enum<E2>`, which was previously accepted
2. it now rejects incompatible class types like `Class<String>` and
  `Class<Int>`, which was previously accepted
3. the check now takes smart cast into consideration, so
  `if (x is String) x == 3` is now rejected
2021-05-06 17:50:32 +03:00
Jinseong Jeon e2dc21da90 FIR checker: warn useless as and is 2021-05-05 18:20:51 +03:00
Ivan Kochurkin 00bc04b3df [FIR] Implement ELSE_MISPLACED_IN_WHEN diagnostics, fix tests 2021-04-19 15:46:38 +03:00
Mikhail Glukhikh f0ff9ad5a7 FIR: rename AMBIGUITY to OVERLOAD_RESOLUTION_AMBIGUITY to match FE 1.0 2021-04-02 16:22:01 +03:00
Dmitriy Novozhilov e6b5cb5216 [TD] Update diagnostics test data due to new test runners
Update includes:
- Changing syntax of `OI/`NI` tags from `<!NI;TAG!>` to `<!TAG{NI}!>`
- Fix some incorrect directives
- Change order of diagnostics in some places
- Remove ignored diagnostics from FIR test data (previously `DIAGNOSTICS` didn't work)
- Update FIR dumps in some places and add `FIR_IDENTICAL` if needed
- Replace all JAVAC_SKIP with SKIP_JAVAC directive
2020-12-16 19:52:25 +03:00
Victor Petukhov 218c13efc5 [FIR] Remove links to spec sentences during comparison fir and old front-end test data 2020-03-30 11:15:55 +03:00
Dmitriy Novozhilov 2536fa0cd5 [FIR-TEST] Add new testdata generated after changes in previous commit 2019-12-12 16:11:46 +03:00