4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ilya Kirillov 1bbcae5ed2 [FIR] fix resolve contract violation from scopes
We cannot call lazy resolve to STATUS phase from scopes as scopes may be accessed on a STATUS phase or earlier

^KT-54890
^KTIJ-23587 fixed
2023-01-13 21:32:51 +00:00
Ilya Kirillov 644d1bf0d0 [FIR] ignore tests which fail because of resolve contracts violation 2022-12-12 16:21:07 +00:00
Mikhail Glukhikh 8884cbe415 Introduce FIR_IDENTICAL for FIR vs old frontend tests #KT-36879 Fixed 2020-03-05 09:39:40 +03:00
dnpetrov 046189087a KT-5963 Call to super shouldn't require type specification if there is no conflict
Implemented unqualified 'super' type resolution (in BasicExpressionTypingVisitor).

No overload resolution of any kind is involved.
Corresponding supertype is determined by the expected member name only:
- 'super.foo(...)' - function or property (of possibly callable type) 'foo'
- 'super.x' - property 'x'
Supertype should provide a non-abstract implementation of such member.
As a fall-back solution for diagnostics purposes, consider supertypes with abstract implementation of such member.

Diagnostics:
- AMBIGUOUS_SUPER on 'super', if multiple possible supertypes are available;
- ABSTRACT_SUPER_CALL on selector expression, if the only available implementation is abstract.

#KT-5963 Fixed
2015-06-18 14:16:34 +03:00