There is a thing that `CandidateCollector` adds error candidate to the
list of resulting candidates only if its applicability at least the
same as current applicability of the collector
Also there is a problem, that deserialized symbol provider in CLI compiler
and stub-based symbol provider in AA may return the same declarations
in different order. This provokes the difference in the resulting set
of candidates between the two modes:
```
val x by unresolved
```
During the resolution of this code compiler tries to find function `getValue`,
and there are 6 of them in the stdlib. From them we are interseted in
specific three:
1. `fun <K, V> Map<K, V>.getValue(key: R|K|): R|V|`
2. `inline operator fun <V, V1 : V> Map<in String, @Exact V>.getValue(thisRef: Any?, property: KProperty<*>): V1`
3. `inline operator fun <V, V1 : V> MutableMap<in String, out @Exact V>.getValue(thisRef: Any?, property: KProperty<*>): V1`
- (1) is inapplicable with `INAPPLICABLE_ARGUMENTS_MAPPING_ERROR`
- (2) and (3) are inapplicable with `INAPPLICABLE_WRONG_RECEIVER`
- `INAPPLICABLE_ARGUMENTS_MAPPING_ERROR` is more specific applicability than `INAPPLICABLE_WRONG_RECEIVER`
- CLI compiler always sees those functions in order 1 -> 2 -> 3
- AA providers sometimes returns them in order 2 -> 3 -> 1
So in CLI compilation candidates (2) and (3) are not added to the resulting
set, as they are "less applicable" than (1), but in AA compilation they
can be added to the set before (1), which causes sporadic change in
FIR dump of `unsafeAssignmentExtra.kt`
To workaround this problem it was decided to treat `INAPPLICABLE_ARGUMENTS_MAPPING_ERROR`
and `INAPPLICABLE_WRONG_RECEIVER` applicabilities as "equally specific"
^KT-65218 Fixed
K1 reports `ARGUMENT_TYPE_MISMATCH`
and `TOO_MANY_ARGUMENTS` together, and
one way to do it in K2 is to say that
their kinds of inapplicability difference
is not relevant to the user.
Note that K1 doesn't do such filtering,
so this change "makes K2 closer to K1",
but still different.
^KT-62541 Fixed
fixup! [FIR] Show ARGUMENTS_MAPPING_ERROR diagnostics along with INAPPLICABLE
Previously, when a candidate was found with an applicability that is
better than the current best applicability, all previous candidates were
thrown away. Now we keep them, unless the new applicability is
successful. If no successful candidates are found, we fully resolve all
the unsuccessful ones and select the ones with the least bad
applicability. This improves diagnostics for unresolved calls.
#KT-57844 Fixed
This directive anyway does not make test run twice with OI, and with NI
It only once run the test with specific settings (// LANGUAGE)
and ignores irrelevant (OI or NI tags)
Specifically, the report the following 4 errors.
* NON_VARARG_SPREAD
* ARGUMENT_PASSED_TWICE
* TOO_MANY_ARGUMENTS
* NO_VALUE_FOR_PARAMETER
Also added/updated the following position strategies.
* NAME_OF_NAMED_ARGUMENT
* VALUE_ARGUMENTS
Dmitriy Novozhilov