In most affected tests, the backend diagnostic such as "conflicting JVM
signature" or "accidental override" is directly caused by some already
existing error reported by frontend, so it doesn't make sense to check
backend diagnostics there.
Tests where that was not the case were moved/copied to
`testsWithJvmBackend`.
This commit changes the behavior of KT-59138 effectively declining it in 2.0.
However, we plan to implement KT-59138 behavior under a feature
flag in 2.0 (see KT-66447), and switch this feature on version 2.x.
Also, this commit implements the LC resolution about postponing
KT-57014 change. We don't have KT-57014 described behavior in 2.0 anymore.
However, we plan to implement a deprecation warning here, see KT-65578.
After this commit, 6 diagnostic tests become incorrectly broken:
- 5 tests from PurelyImplementedCollection group
- a test platformTypes/nullableTypeArgument.kt
This commit also breaks currently fixed-in-k2 KT-50134
(it is fixed again in the following commits),
as well as KT-58933 (it will remain not fixed till we enable KT-59138
behavior again).
#KT-65596 In Progress
#KT-57014 In Progress
#KT-58933 Submitted
Check all members for `Visibility.Unknown`,
otherwise we miss them when they come
from supertypes. This is the reason why
the FP intellij build failed with a
cryptic stacktrace instead of a
human-readable diagnostic.
Also, do report the diagnostic at all
cases of `Visibilities.Unknown`. Turns
out, there are no "simple to reason
about" situations here :(
Also, an interesting detail:
`retrieveDirectOverriddenOf` returns an
empty list for intersection overrides.
But this doesn't seem to break anything...
Replacing `CANNOT_INFER_VISIBILITY`'s
type `KtDeclaration` with
`PsiNameIdentifierOwner` and the related
changes in `PositioningStrategies`
were needed to prevent an exception saying that
`PsiClassImpl` is not a subtype of
`KtDeclaration`.
`testIntersectionOfPrimitiveBasedFunctions`
is fine, because we deprecate this
already in ^KT-63243.
`CANNOT_INFER_VISIBILITY` is
positioned as `DECLARATION_NAME`,
just in case we decide for
some reason that we do want to
report it along with
`MANY_*_NOT_IMPLEMENTED`. In that
case, we'd get a problem that
their bounds overlap, but not
completely contain one another.
^KT-63741 Fixed
^KT-59400 Fixed
This fixes a bunch of missing overridden symbols in IR.
This is also required for fixing KT-59921 in the following commit
where we need to keep all overridden symbols of intersection overrides
so that we can enhance them properly.
#KT-57300 Fixed
#KT-57299 Fixed
#KT-59921
#KT-57300
#KT-62788
#KT-64271
#KT-64382
See callingOuterGenericClassConstructorWithSelfTypes.kt
Previously, for A<B>(""), we used substituted constructor
where `X` was substituted with `B` (or `A<X>.B`).
But when resolving the call for constructor, we use `X`
as a type variable of the call, thus in some positions
we used `X` as TV (Xv in the comments) and somewhere `X` as a type
parameter, thus leading to contradictions (see clarifying comment).
The idea of the fix is simply repeating of the regular (not delegated)
constructor call resolution:
- We substitute only type parameters of outer class
- All the declared parameters of the callee are being checked
through regular resolution & inference mechanisms.
NB: Diagnostic only being reported on arguments because there
when we add `String <: Any` constraint it fails due to existing
contradiction in the CS.
Without the argument/parameter the error is just being lost, but that's
a different story (seeKT-65224).
^KT-64841 Fixed
This fixes a false positive OVERRIDING_FINAL_MEMBER caused by a
package-private member in a different package being added to the
list of overridden symbols. However, in Java, package-private members
from different packages are effectively like private members in that
they cannot be overridden.
#KT-61696 Fixed
Reporting it for `VIRTUAL_MEMBER_HIDDEN`
is ok, because `VIRTUAL_MEMBER_HIDDEN`
has always been an error, so we are
allowed to treat these as overrides
implicitly.
^KT-59408 Fixed
^KT-59419 Fixed
^KT-57076 Fixed
It's possible to write a fix that
would prevent false positives with
this checker, but the core
intuition behind it is invalid.
This checker assumes that it's
enough to only check direct
overriddens, while in reality
even simple `Source` override
functions are not allowed to
contain default values, so they
can't be used to make judgements
about them.
^KT-59408 Open
^KT-59408 Open
^KT-61095 Fixed
^KT-61165 Fixed
^KT-61029 Fixed
This change prevents going up the scopes once we find a
substitution override. Whatever we'd find by going further is not
going to be a direct overridden anymore, so it would lead to incorrect
results when collecting direct overridden-s. Without this change, we get
error modules in FT intellij.
If an intersection override overrides members A.x, B.x and C.x and
B <: A, then A.x is subsumed by B.x, and we don't add it to the list of
overridden members. This fixes a false-positive MANY_IMPL_MEMBER_NOT_
IMPLEMENTED where an implementation is subsumed by an abstract override.
^KT-57092 Fixed
This change allows to revert adding `WITH_STDLIB` directive
to tests which happened at `a9343aeb`.
Co-authored-by: Alexander Udalov <Alexander.Udalov@jetbrains.com>
This big refactoring is needed to cleanup building of overrides
mappings and prevent creating redundant intersection overrides in
cases when there is no need in them:
```kotlin
interface A {
fun foo()
}
interface B {
fun foo()
}
interface C : A, B {
override fun foo()
}
```
Before this refactoring there was next override tree:
C.foo
intersection override (A.foo, B.foo)
A.foo
B.foo
Also this commit fixes special mapping of overrides in jvm scopes
for declarations which have kotlin builtins in supertypes with
special java mapping rules (collections, for example)
In this commit we drop less concrete members in intersection.
See for example change in test data: before the commit, we intersected
all three A.foo, B.foo and C.foo in diamond hierarchy. After the commit
we drop A.foo and intersect B.foo and C.foo only.
If some java class has multiple supertypes then we need to collect
overriddens from all those types directly, even if superTypeScope
(which is FirTypeIntersectionScope in this case) returns only
one symbol from one of this types (not intersection one)
This is needed to proper enhancement in cases when some type occurs
multiple times in supertypes graph with different nullability
of arguments:
class ConcurrentHashMap<K, V> : AbstractMap<K!, V!>, MutableMap<K, V>
If we try to find method `get(key: K): V` supertype scope returns
`AbstractMap.get(key: K!): V!` (because it actually overrides
`MutableMap(key: K): V?`), but we need to get both symbols to
properly enhance types for `ConcurrentHashMap.remove`
Mikhail Glukhikh