7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Denis.Zharkov b9019d3de1 K2: Adjust test data after PCLA implementation [red-to-green]
^KT-59791 In Progress
2024-01-10 14:56:30 +00:00
Mikhail Glukhikh 0ed6256bcc K2: implement BUILDER_INFERENCE_STUB_RECEIVER
#KT-59369 Fixed
2023-12-01 10:54:29 +00:00
Kirill Rakhman 724d527fd8 [FIR] Fixes for call conflict resolution
Let ConeCompositeConflictResolver pass the results of the previous
resolver to the next one.
Otherwise, we get false positive conflicts when a set of candidates
can't be fully reduced by one resolver but could be resolved by the
subsequent application of multiple ones.
This change makes ConeCompositeConflictResolver order-dependent and
thus, ConeOverloadConflictResolver must be invoked last, because it
must work on a pre-filtered list.

Also, let ConeEquivalentCallConflictResolver use
FirStandardOverrideChecker instead of compareCallsByUsedArguments
because it's stricter.

This all fixes a false positive overload resolution ambiguity in common
metadata compilation that is caused by stdlib using the new KMP
format.
Now stdlib metadata is in the classpath, and so declarations from the
stdlib are returned from both MetadataSymbolProvider and
KlibBasedSymbolProvider.
This isn't a problem per se because duplicate candidates are filtered
out by ConeEquivalentCallConflictResolver (K1 works analogously), but
in the case of top-level functions with generic receivers like
Collection<T>.toTypedArray, the check failed because of the direct
comparison of receiver types.

#KT-60943 Fixed
2023-08-11 10:54:24 +00:00
Simon Ogorodnik 105358dcf6 K1: add diagnostic BUILDER_INFERENCE_MULTI_LAMBDA_RESTRICTION
Let's call builder lambdas (BL) a lambda that has non-fixed input type
projection at the moment of lambda arguments analysis, such lambdas
is a subject to be analyzed with builder inference
Due to bug in constraint system joining algorithm, currently system
of two or more such lambdas may lead to unsound type inference

Diagnostic added here should be reported in case when there are two
BL that shares a common constraint system, while not annotated with
@BuilderInference, as a protection against aforementioned bug

It's reported by ConstraintSystemCompleter when such situation has
occurred during builder inference phase, it is the same place that
decides wherever lambdas is subject to builder inference or not

KT-53740
2022-08-30 10:19:25 +00:00
Victor Petukhov fa7809cd80 [FE] Remove BuilderInference annotation from tests 2022-06-21 15:01:56 +02:00
Mikhail Glukhikh e8be9d4861 FIR: support don't use builder inference if possible
In this commit we upgrade FIR builder inference logic from
the compiler version to 1.7. FIR-based compiler now works with
"don't use builder inference" flag always ON and supports switching
the flag "use builder inference only if needed". To do it,
ContraintSystemCompleter (FIR) and KotlinConstraintSystemCompleter (FE 1.0)
are made similar with extracting some common parts into
ConstraintSystemCompletionContext.

Test status: one BB test fails after this commit (KT-49285).
Also we have a crush in DFA logic in FIR bootstrap test and somehow
questionable behavior in FIR diagnostic test. However,
two BB tests were fixed, the 3rd case from KT-49925 were also fixed.

#KT-49925 Fixed
2022-01-20 23:46:36 +03:00
Victor Petukhov 455b3143e7 [FE 1.0] Introduce builder inference stub types checker which may report more precise and clear errors due to resolution ambiguity
^KT-49828 Fixed
2022-01-11 18:34:47 +03:00