 Mikhail Glukhikh
|
bbee881b5b
|
K1: add separate TYPECHECKER_HAS_RUN_INTO_RECURSIVE_PROBLEM_IN_AUGMENTED_ASSIGNMENT
This is made to have a correct error message for a problem
described in KT-48546
#KT-48546 Fixed
|
2023-05-02 12:57:15 +00:00 |
|
|
Dmitriy Novozhilov
|
86af01439c
|
[FIR] Allow to access uninitialized member properties in non-inPlace lambdas in class initialization
^KT-56696 Fixed
^KT-56408
|
2023-02-17 11:26:18 +00:00 |
|
|
Dmitriy Novozhilov
|
c87e489dc9
|
[FIR] Run CFA for member properties even if they have initializer
^KT-56678 Fixed
^KT-56682 Fixed
|
2023-02-17 11:26:17 +00:00 |
|
|
Ivan Kochurkin
|
9f69ea1786
|
[FIR] Add TYPECHECKER_HAS_RUN_INTO_RECURSIVE_PROBLEM diagnostics, ^KT-52327 Fixed
|
2022-06-17 23:26:16 +00:00 |
|
|
Victor Petukhov
|
57a134c543
|
[FE 1.0] Report recursive type checker problem as a warning till 1.9
^KT-48546
|
2022-03-23 21:13:34 +00:00 |
|
|
Victor Petukhov
|
2307122089
|
[FE 1.0] Report errors for recursive types from completion as well
Such diagnostics could be missed at least for plus assignment's right side because it wasn't report for the second time of analysis
^KT-48546 Fixed
|
2022-03-23 21:13:34 +00:00 |
|