Even ones inside inline functions. This was a backwards compatibility
hack for Kotlin 1.4, where the inliner would crash if it attempted to
regenerate an anonymous object with no SMAP; that has been fixed in 1.5,
and ever since then trivial SMAPs could be inferred from line number
markers in methods.
There are three kinds of changes to tests in this commit:
* Some SMAPs are gone entirely - self-explanatory.
* Some SMAPs have narrower line ranges - that's because the old SMAP
had the range for the entire file, while the new one only maps up to
the last line number used in the class. There should be no
difference in behavior.
* Some "source file name" markers are removed in continuation objects
- continuations don't have any line numbers, so there's no debugging
information anyway. The actual source information is in the
containing class.
boxInline tests for suspend use StateMachineChecker and share the state
if compiled and run together. The single value accessed from all tests.
It is enough to reset state before the test is run.
We are going to deprecate `WITH_RUNTIME` directive. The main reason
behind this change is that `WITH_STDLIB` directive better describes
its meaning, specifically it will add kotlin stdlib to test's classpath.
The main idea is the following: since we need to generate
(fake)continuations before inlining, we move IrClasses of suspend
lambdas and continuation classes of named functions into the functions.
Thus, it allows the codegen to generate them prior to inlining and
the inliner will happily transform them for us.
Because of that, lowerings which transform call-site function are likely
to change reference to lowered suspend lambdas or functions.
Hence, do not rely on references to lowered suspend lambdas or
functions, instead, rely on attributes.
Do not generate continuation for inline suspend lambdas.
Previously, inline suspend lambdas were treated like suspend functions,
thus we generated continuations for them. Now we just do not treat them
as suspend functions or lambdas during AddContinuationLowering.
We should add continuation parameter to them, however.
Do not generate secondary constructor for suspend lambdas, otherwise,
the inliner is unable to transform them (it requires only one
constructor to be present).
Generate continuation classes for suspend functions as first statement
inside the function.
This enables suspend functions in local object inside inline functions.
Since we already have attributes inside suspend named functions, we
just reuse them to generate continuation class names. This allows us
to close the gap between code generated by old back-end and the new
one.
If a suspend named function captures crossinline lambda, we should
generate a template for inliner: a copy of the function without
state-machine and a continuation constructor call. The call is needed
so the inliner transforms the continuation as well.
Refactor CoroutineTransformerMethodVisitor, so it no longer depends on
PSI.
Previously it was linear scan, failing on unbalanced suspension markers.
Now, I use CFG to find end markers, which are reachable from start
markers. Using CFG allows to walk through suspension point instructions
only, since they form region.
If, for some reason, end marker does not exist (inliner or unreachable
code elimination pass remove unreachable code) or is unreachable,
just ignore the whole suspension point, as before.
#KT-33172 Fixed
#KT-28507 Fixed
if they are not inlined, but directly called.
Previously, all inline and crossinline lambda calls were treated by
codegen as if they are always going to be inlined. However, this is not
always the case.
Note, that we cannot generate these markers during codegen, since we
can inline code with no suspension points, but the whole inlined code
will become one giant suspension point. This, of course, breaks
tail-call optimization and, hence, slows down cold streams.
Because of that, we generate these markers, when we are sure, that they
are not going to be inlined. The only place, in which we know that, is
the inliner. During inlining of the inline function, we check, whether
the parameter is inline or crossinline and whether it is not an inline
lambda. If these checks pass, we generate the markers. Noinline
parameters are already covered by the codegen.
#KT-30706 Fixed
#KT-26925 Fixed
#KT-26418 Fixed
Introduce COMMON_COROUTINES_TEST directive.
Every test with this directive is run twice: one time with
language version 1.2 and kotlin.coroutines.experimental package
and the other time with language version 1.3 and kotlin.coroutines
package. Each run is a separate method: with suffixes _1_2 and _1_3
respectively.
However, since codegen of release coroutines is not supported in JS
backend, we generate only one method: with suffix _1_2.
#KT-23362
Use fake continuation instead of ALOAD 0 while inlining
Do not generate state machine for inner lambdas and inner objects,
which capture crossinline suspend lambda.
#KT-19159: Fixed
Sonya Valchuk