The base class in scripting considered obsolete and therefore supported
via some ad-hoc mechanisms. In particular parameters to the base class
c-tor are passed via script provided properties. But in combination
with the resolution logic, this leads to issues described in KT-60452
This commits filters out such parameters from script resolution
scope and avoids this problem for now.
Bot it should be noted that proper diagnostics for properties shadowing
should still be implemented - see #KT-65809
#KT-60452 fixed
`IrProvider`s are used to bind unbound symbols which are left after IR
construction. fir2ir doesn't leave any unbound symbols in the tree,
so there is actually no need in FirIrProvider at all
Before this commit, the expect-actual resolver could find expects in
regular dependencies
Note: The appeared `VIRTUAL_MEMBER_HIDDEN` in
compiler/fir/analysis-tests/testData/resolveWithStdlib/multiModule/FakeOverrides.kt
isn't caused by my change. It's caused by fixing the testData dependency
syntax notation.
The testData improperly used regular dependency syntax notation, while
it should have been using dependsOn
Before:
Regular dependency syntax notation
// MODULE: androidMain(commonMain)
After:
dependsOn dependency syntax notation
// MODULE: androidMain()()(commonMain)
The previous one was incorrect for K1 since parent of top-level function
is `IrClass`, not `IrPackageFragment`.
The change is non-functional, K1 still worked correctly, but had to do
some extra work when inlining `emptyArray` calls and produces less
performant bytecode.
Otherwise, when analyzing
`PsiTypeParameterListOwner` in the
related test, we (after flattening and
`nonSubsumed()`) get 2 `JvmMember.accept`
from the same very java enhancement
scope `JvmMember`.
^KT-65972
After this change the IO created for
`SimpleColoredComponent::setToolTipText`
will be `containsMultipleNonSubsumed == true`
while IOs created for classes in
`intersectionOverridesIntersection.kt`
will have this property set to `false`.
^KT-65972 Fixed
Allow multiple bases with default
implementations as long as there's a
non-abstract symbol from a class.
Our rules for Kotlin are stricter than
those in Java.
Check all members for `Visibility.Unknown`,
otherwise we miss them when they come
from supertypes. This is the reason why
the FP intellij build failed with a
cryptic stacktrace instead of a
human-readable diagnostic.
Also, do report the diagnostic at all
cases of `Visibilities.Unknown`. Turns
out, there are no "simple to reason
about" situations here :(
Also, an interesting detail:
`retrieveDirectOverriddenOf` returns an
empty list for intersection overrides.
But this doesn't seem to break anything...
Replacing `CANNOT_INFER_VISIBILITY`'s
type `KtDeclaration` with
`PsiNameIdentifierOwner` and the related
changes in `PositioningStrategies`
were needed to prevent an exception saying that
`PsiClassImpl` is not a subtype of
`KtDeclaration`.
This code does lead to inferring
`Visibilities.Unknown`, but it's not
reported anywhere. This is because it
happens inside `AbstractIntSet` which
comes to us "pre-compiled" by javac,
whereas `FirOverrideChecker` only checks
members within `KotlinClass`.
^KT-65972
The rule of thumb is the following:
If the `if` and `when` can be successfully replaced with `while`,
then it is used as a statement, otherwise, it is used as an expression.
#KT-59883
All existing tests use custom test data for FIR because the diagnostic
text in FIR has to have a dot at the end. Also, the K2 checker doesn't
check usages in imports because there are no "import checkers" in K2
right now, this will need to be fixed later if necessary.
#KT-60797 Fixed
Previously @EnhancedNullability for IR type was added if only there wasn't
an @FlexibleNullability annotation, which is inconsistent with K1
behavior
^KT-65302 Fixed
In some cases we transform flexible type into non-flexible during
enhancement, but don't add `@EnhancedNullability` attribute to them,
which breaks consistency with K1 on IR level
This commit fixes it
^KT-65302
Ilya Chernikov