This commit changes the behavior of KT-59138 effectively declining it in 2.0.
However, we plan to implement KT-59138 behavior under a feature
flag in 2.0 (see KT-66447), and switch this feature on version 2.x.
Also, this commit implements the LC resolution about postponing
KT-57014 change. We don't have KT-57014 described behavior in 2.0 anymore.
However, we plan to implement a deprecation warning here, see KT-65578.
After this commit, 6 diagnostic tests become incorrectly broken:
- 5 tests from PurelyImplementedCollection group
- a test platformTypes/nullableTypeArgument.kt
This commit also breaks currently fixed-in-k2 KT-50134
(it is fixed again in the following commits),
as well as KT-58933 (it will remain not fixed till we enable KT-59138
behavior again).
#KT-65596 In Progress
#KT-57014 In Progress
#KT-58933 Submitted
That issue might be fixed via changing
TypeVariableMarker.shouldBeFlexible at ConeConstraintSystemUtilContext
but this and some other tricks have been added because of incorrect
handling of constraints where type variable has a flexible bound
^KT-51168 Fixed
Type of a block is a kind of irrelevant for lambdas: their type is much
more complicated and defined via FirDataFlowAnalyzer#returnExpressionsOfAnonymousFunction
at at FirCallCompleter.LambdaAnalyzerImpl#analyzeAndGetLambdaReturnArguments
Update includes:
- Changing syntax of `OI/`NI` tags from `<!NI;TAG!>` to `<!TAG{NI}!>`
- Fix some incorrect directives
- Change order of diagnostics in some places
- Remove ignored diagnostics from FIR test data (previously `DIAGNOSTICS` didn't work)
- Update FIR dumps in some places and add `FIR_IDENTICAL` if needed
- Replace all JAVAC_SKIP with SKIP_JAVAC directive
Several tests are affected by the usage of fixation direction calculator in FIR.
Restored to mimimize test data changes.
It is unnecessary in FE10 because a type variable with unknown type
is inferred into an error type, but affects test data in FIR where
Nothing/Any is selected by direction (as a temporary measure).
CR candidate in spec test is Unresolved in FIR because top-level CRs are resolved as call arguments.
Resolution ambiguity is also present in FE10 when CR is wrapped into an id call.
Mikhail Glukhikh