68 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Kirill Rakhman 8443daf78d [FIR] Remove FirNamedArgumentExpressions during completion
They are mostly necessary for argument mapping during resolution.
To support a couple checkers, we transform named args for varargs
into "fake" spread expressions.

Other than that, named arguments aren't needed for anything and often
lead to bugs where we forget to unwrap them for something, so it's
better to get rid of them.

#KT-66124
2024-03-13 17:05:48 +00:00
Kirill Rakhman 03fc0fd381 [FIR] Remove FirLambdaArgumentExpression
It's not really necessary if the information about if the lambda was a
trailing lambda can be directly saved in FirAnonymousFunctionExpression.

Removing the FIR node uncovered a couple of bugs
(UNINITIALIZED_ENUM_ENTRY, ERROR_IN_CONTRACT_DESCRIPTION) that were
caused by assuming that a lambda is always a trailing lambda.

#KT-66124
2024-03-13 17:05:48 +00:00
Roman Golyshev b765cf3f99 KT-66411 [AA] Add fake source kind for single expression block around array assignments
A wrapper block was introduced as a part of fixing KT-59748, but was
assigned a real source, which had `getOrBuildFir` confused because
of the incorrectly built `KtToFirMapping`

It is relevant for:
- `if`, `when` expressions with an assignment as a single expression
- Kotlin code fragments,
when the assignment is being analysed as a single expression
in the fragment

^KT-66411 Fixed
2024-03-10 15:35:47 +00:00
Roman Golyshev ec06654a73 KT-66411 [AA] Add test for the getOrBuildFir on array assignment expression as a single when/if branch expression 2024-03-10 15:35:47 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin d5cfea330b [LL FIR] support parameters resolution
Script parameters now can be resolved independently of the script.
But, as parameters are part of the script, their resolve will be called
before the script.

^KT-66276 Fixed
2024-03-07 12:50:59 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin 1ba81fca57 [Analysis API] add tests on incomplete function type parameter symbol
^KT-65858 Obsolete
2024-03-06 16:09:43 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin f844b87f75 [LL FIR] FirElementBuilder: do nothing for KtAnnotation
We shouldn't try to find FIR for such elements as they just don't
exist in FIR

^KT-65780
2024-03-01 19:19:00 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin 62ec189924 [LL FIR] add getOrBuildFir for KtAnnotation
^KT-65780
2024-03-01 19:19:00 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin 16878ca20d [LL FIR] FirElementBuilder: support KtAnnotation in file annotations
^KT-65780
2024-03-01 19:19:00 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin ba92fc97f9 [LL FIR] add test on annotation with [] syntax
^KT-65780
2024-03-01 19:19:00 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin 17c128adf2 [FIR] get rid of FirFileAnnotationsContainer
This element has been introduced to simplify resolution logic in LL FIR,
but now this element is redundant and only complicates the code as after
KT-56683 `FirFile` has real phases

^KT-65876 Fixed
2024-03-01 19:19:00 +00:00
Ilya Chernikov 9037975758 K2 Scripting: Skip base class params from resolution scope
The base class in scripting considered obsolete and therefore supported
via some ad-hoc mechanisms. In particular parameters to the base class
c-tor are passed via script provided properties. But in combination
with the resolution logic, this leads to issues described in KT-60452
This commits filters out such parameters from script resolution
scope and avoids this problem for now.
Bot it should be noted that proper diagnostics for properties shadowing
should still be implemented - see #KT-65809
#KT-60452 fixed
2024-02-23 22:03:44 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin 78c394d4de [LL FIR] FirElementBuilder: search file header elements without body resolution
^KT-65780
2024-02-14 17:53:31 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin 38a3010ac8 [LL FIR] FirElementBuilder: search file annotations without body resolution
^KT-65780
2024-02-14 17:53:31 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin 7796ef43db [LL FIR] FileStructure: resolve FirFile to body phase as all other elements
This is the correct behavior as we have to resolve to body phase
to build CFG and run diagnostics collector correctly

^KT-65780 Fixed
2024-02-14 17:53:31 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin 84b6d5d508 [LL FIR] add tests for getOrBuildFir for KtFileAnnotationList
^KT-65780
2024-02-14 17:53:31 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin e02c28c88a [LL FIR] support lazy resolve of destructuring declaration entries
^KT-62840 Fixed
^KT-65727
2024-02-14 16:16:01 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin 8c63e75f06 [LL FIR] update destructuringEntryScript testData
To reproduce getOrBuildFir for KtDestructuringDeclarationEntry

^KT-62840
2024-02-14 16:16:01 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin 312feb3dca [FIR] make script destructuring declaration entry initializer lazy expression
This change is required to properly support such declarations in lazy
resolution mode as we usually replaced initializers with lazy
expressions during the body calculation phase

^KT-62840
2024-02-14 16:16:01 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin 256d83b005 [LL FIR] support lazy resolve of <destruct> script declaration
But support for entries still is not implemented yet

^KT-62840
2024-02-14 16:16:01 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin 792af849df [LL FIR] add getOrBuildFir test on destructuring declaration annotation
It doesn't resolve the property as it is treated as a local one

^KT-62840
2024-02-14 16:16:01 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin 9ca0bdcb80 [FIR] make script destructuring declaration initializer lazy expression
This change is required to properly support such declarations in lazy
resolution mode as we usually replaced initializers with lazy
expressions during the body calculation phase

^KT-62840
2024-02-14 16:16:01 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin 58ad26ee5b [LL FIR] make script initializers independent
Now we can resolve all script declarations independently

^KT-65344 Fixed
2024-02-13 14:58:31 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin 4f0bc86ad4 [LL FIR] make result$$ property independent
Now we can resolve this generated property in the same way
as other regular properties.
This is the pre-step for independent script initializers

^KT-65344
^KT-65523
2024-02-13 14:58:31 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin 338c533a58 [FIR] FirScriptConfigurationExtensionImpl: change source element for result$$ property
We should use the source from replaced `FirAnonymousInitializer` as it
is more equivalent. Another point – the previous implementation
duplicated the source between generated FirProperty and initializer

^KT-65344
2024-02-13 14:58:31 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin f972c8d239 [LL FIR] add more tests for script initializer
^KT-65344
2024-02-13 14:58:31 +00:00
Marco Pennekamp eb6f30dcd4 [LL] Update stub-based deserialization of enum entry annotation arguments
- This mirrors the changes to `AbstractAnnotationDeserializer` in the
  scope of KT-64975.

^KT-63330 fixed
^KT-64975
2024-02-01 20:26:58 +00:00
Marco Pennekamp a38d613dc3 [LL] Add getOrBuildFir test for deserialized enum entry annotation argument
- The `getOrBuildFir` test clearly shows the difference between the
  unresolved enum entry and the resolved one (see the next commit).

^KT-63330
2024-02-01 20:26:58 +00:00
vladislav.grechko 9aa8fb80e7 Set correct IR origins for inc/dec operations
NB: in order to produce correct IR origins, the source element kinds for
some FIR elements has been changed. As a side effect, mapping PSI to FIR
slightly changed: namely, for `a[b]++`, `a[b]` used to be mapped on
`set` call or callable reference, but now it is mapped on `get` call.

^KT-61891: Fixed
^KT-64387: Fixed
2024-01-30 14:26:10 +00:00
Simon Ogorodnik 53e89a9722 K2. Minor. Rename FirConstExpression to FirLiteralExpression
FirConstExpression is usually confused with "constant" calculations,
while in fact, it just denotes a simple literal expression
and `1 + 1` isn't represented by a FirConstExpression.

^KT-64314 Fixed
2024-01-25 23:05:15 +00:00
Ivan Kochurkin 69b9bfc3e0 [FIR] Initialize public visibility for class-like declarations at FIR building phase if no modifier is presented
Java resolving subsystem requires calculated visibility for correct disambiguation of supertypes.
But visibility remains `Unknown` for Kotlin class-like declarations during supertypes resolving because `STATUS` resolve phase is performed after `SUPER_TYPES` phase.
To fix the problem, the visibility should be initialized to public at the FIR building phase if no modifier is presented.

^KT-64127 Fixed
2024-01-04 16:17:32 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin 2bad2f37ce [LL FIR] add missed ClassId check for combined Java classes symbol provider
findClasses works over regular `PsiElementFinder`, which doesn't know
about out ClassId conception. So, `a/b/A.B` and `a/b/A/B` are the same
from `FqName` point of view.
`FirJavaFacade` has this check, so this problem appears only in the case
of combined provider.

^KT-62892 Fixed
2024-01-03 21:35:12 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin a39688ba10 [LL FIR] add tests on fir for full qualified name for nested classes
For some reason, outer Java class is treated as a package

^KT-62892
2024-01-03 21:35:12 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin 06950f57db [Analysis API] add tests for delegate field
^KT-64584
2023-12-28 08:48:08 +00:00
vladislav.grechko 77d0d1073e Preserve origins when desugaring augmented array assignments
^KT-63827: Fixed
2023-12-20 17:15:40 +00:00
Ilya Chernikov db804b7f93 K2 Scripting: fix CFG processing related testdata in LL 2023-12-12 09:58:19 +00:00
Ilya Chernikov a69eaa0ea3 K2 Scripting: fix testdata changed after script statements wrapping 2023-12-12 09:58:19 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin 97956b4374 [LL FIR] resolve propagated type annotations correctly
This commit is Low Level FIR part of changes around propagated
annotations (aka foreign annotations).
It includes such changes as:
* implicit type phase postpones foreign annotations resolution
* annotation arguments are requests resolution for postponed
annotations from implicit type phase as a pre-resolve step
* body resolve phase just calls lazy resolution for foreign annotations
on demand
* isResolved check for type annotations to be sure that all annotations
are resolved after annotation arguments phase

^KT-63042 Fixed
^KT-63681 Fixed
2023-12-07 12:26:40 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin 9888cbbfcd [FIR] do not transform propagated annotations from place other than declaration side
We shouldn't transform annotations not from declaration side due to
a possible different context and to avoid unexpected transformation of
unrelated declarations

Example:
```kotlin
fun implicitType1() = TopLevelObject.expectedType()

object TopLevelObject {
    private const val privateConstVal = "privateConstVal"
    fun expectedType(): @Anno(privateConstVal) Int = 4
}
```
Here we will try to transform the annotation from `expectedType`
during `implicitType1` and as the result, we will see unresolved
reference on the declaration side. This commit fixes this issue.

This solution is based on the fact that the compiler anyway will
resolve the propagated annotation on the declaration side.
And it doesn't matter if it is resolved before or after the call site
declaration transformation, because as a global result, we will observe
that all declarations are resolved correctly in the right context.

Hence, this commit fixes the issue in the case of "full resolution"
which is true for the compiler, but it is not correct for Low Level
FIR where we resolve declarations on demand. It will be solved in
the next commits

^KT-63042
2023-12-07 12:26:40 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin 264a151676 [FIR] do not copy annotations during type propagation
We should share the original instance to be able to later resolve it in
the original context. This commit returns the KT-60387 problem, but the
root cause (concurrent modification) will be fixed in the context of
KT-63042

^KT-63042
2023-12-07 12:26:39 +00:00
Roman Golyshev 99c7fab401 KT-59732 [FIR] Adjust test data for the absence of unresolved imports
Now there are no real unresolved imports - all imports are considered
resolved starting from the IMPORTS phase and until they are proven
otherwise in the checkers.

Because of that, some `UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE` diagnostics are gone -
in the cases when such references were actually resolved through
those unsupported imports.

The compilation of incorrect files should not be affected by this,
the checkers would still prevent the compilation of the files with
incorrect imports.
But now the references to the declarations from such imports no longer
will be highlighted as unresolved references.
2023-12-04 16:51:46 +00:00
Nikita Bobko 8c0cf7d0bc [FIR] Fix disappeared ACTUAL_MISSING
^KT-59887 Fixed

Review: https://jetbrains.team/p/kt/reviews/13244
2023-12-04 13:08:23 +00:00
Nikita Bobko 453d871b25 [LL] Run LLFirExpectActualMatchingTargetResolver only for KMP projects
Review: https://jetbrains.team/p/kt/reviews/13244

Motivation: Performance. When I fix KT-59887 in later commits, I will
make actual-to-expect resolve to work not only for actual declarations.
Considering that LLFirExpectActualMatcherLazyResolver worked even for
non-KMP projects that might be a potential performance regression

FirExpectActualMatcherProcessor in the compiler does the same thing (it
checks for MultiPlatformProjects before running the transformer)
2023-12-04 13:08:23 +00:00
Kirill Rakhman dd1d36816b [FIR] Insert SAM conversion expressions during completion
#KT-62847 Fixed
2023-11-30 08:39:04 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin 5183019cb8 [LL FIR] resolve class before constructor
This is required to have stable resolution order to avoid concurrent
modifications and correct resolution context.
This also fixes KT-63700 as a super call expands only during body
resolution in the case of secondary constructor

^KT-63042
^KT-63700 Fixed
2023-11-23 15:55:07 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin a79cef08b5 [LL FIR] resolve generated property before componentN
This is required to have stable resolution order to avoid concurrent
modifications.
Another point here – status phase logic for componentN function is
located in the corresponding property resolution

^KT-63042
2023-11-23 15:55:07 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin 6ecaccbcfe [FIR] PsiRawFirBuilder: reuse type for property from constructor parameter
Previously, this call was required to avoid sharing to have independent
instances with their own resolution cycle. Now we will have stable
order (in the next commit), so it is possible to share instances.
Also, this change makes the logic consistency with Light Tree

^KT-63042
2023-11-23 15:55:06 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin 8dacd41818 [LL FIR] introduce lazy resolve tests for type annotations
From one side to check how annotation propagation works and from another
side to cover scenarios with lazy resolution from type position as it is
a valid case of usage in Analysis API (KtFirAnnotationListForType)

^KT-63042
2023-11-23 15:55:06 +00:00
Kirill Rakhman 1ecbc094ec [FIR] Save warning-level enhanced types to an attribute
#KT-56989
2023-11-15 08:43:55 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin ba7c341338 [LL FIR] annotation calculator for scripts should process only script inself
We shouldn't calculate annotations inside unrelated declarations without lock

^KT-63042
^KT-63282
2023-11-08 23:22:19 +00:00