[FIR] Improve diagnostic reporting & don't use error symbol for candidate if possible

Also introduce few new diagnostics:
- NONE_APPLICABLE more many inapplicable candidates
- HIDDEN for visible candidates

compiler/fir/analysis-tests/testData/resolveWithStdlib/j+k/JavaVisibility2.kt

@@ -22,24 +22,24 @@ import j.JavaProtected
 import j.JavaPackageLocal
 
 class A {
-    val p1 = JavaPackageLocal.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>javaPPackage<!>
-    val p2 = JavaProtected.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>javaPProtectedStatic<!>
-    val p3 = JavaProtected().<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>javaPProtectedPackage<!>
+    val p1 = JavaPackageLocal.<!HIDDEN!>javaPPackage<!>
+    val p2 = JavaProtected.<!HIDDEN!>javaPProtectedStatic<!>
+    val p3 = JavaProtected().<!HIDDEN!>javaPProtectedPackage<!>
 
     fun test() {
-        JavaProtected.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>javaMProtectedStatic<!>()
-        JavaPackageLocal.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>javaMPackage<!>()
+        JavaProtected.<!HIDDEN!>javaMProtectedStatic<!>()
+        JavaPackageLocal.<!HIDDEN!>javaMPackage<!>()
     }
 }
 
 class B : JavaProtected() {
-    val p1 = JavaPackageLocal.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>javaPPackage<!>
+    val p1 = JavaPackageLocal.<!HIDDEN!>javaPPackage<!>
     val p2 = JavaProtected.javaPProtectedStatic
     val p3 = javaPProtectedPackage
 
     fun test() {
         JavaProtected.javaMProtectedStatic()
-        JavaPackageLocal.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>javaMPackage<!>()
+        JavaPackageLocal.<!HIDDEN!>javaMPackage<!>()
     }
 }
 
@@ -59,4 +59,4 @@ class C {
         JavaProtected.javaMProtectedStatic()
         JavaPackageLocal.javaMPackage()
     }
-}
+}