From ef53bd9548d18a44e8bf2c169d60c1946e8cadb3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wojciech Litewka <wojciech.litewka@jetbrains.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 13:45:28 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [IR generator] Add missing isChild = false

Those fields were effectively marked as child elements after refactor.
However, because of the current (to possibly be changed) configuration,
the generator did not write accept methods for them.
---
 .../src/org/jetbrains/kotlin/ir/generator/IrTree.kt           | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/compiler/ir/ir.tree/tree-generator/src/org/jetbrains/kotlin/ir/generator/IrTree.kt b/compiler/ir/ir.tree/tree-generator/src/org/jetbrains/kotlin/ir/generator/IrTree.kt
index 0d1c0b3cc4e..416daca6bf4 100644
--- a/compiler/ir/ir.tree/tree-generator/src/org/jetbrains/kotlin/ir/generator/IrTree.kt
+++ b/compiler/ir/ir.tree/tree-generator/src/org/jetbrains/kotlin/ir/generator/IrTree.kt
@@ -860,8 +860,8 @@ object IrTree : AbstractTreeBuilder() {
 
         visitorParameterName = "inlinedBlock"
 
-        +field("inlineCall", functionAccessExpression)
-        +field("inlinedElement", rootElement)
+        +field("inlineCall", functionAccessExpression, isChild = false)
+        +field("inlinedElement", rootElement, isChild = false)
     }
     val syntheticBody: Element by element(Expression) {
         visitorParameterName = "body"