FIR checker: differentiate UNSAFE_CALL from INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE

To do so, inside the root cause of inapplicable candidate errors,
we will record expected/actual type of receiver, if any.
That will help identifying inapplicable calls on nullable receiver.
This commit is contained in:
Jinseong Jeon
2021-01-26 16:03:27 -08:00
committed by Mikhail Glukhikh
parent 4b823eca21
commit e72ddbcbfe
275 changed files with 1426 additions and 1388 deletions
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ fun case_1() {
<!DEBUG_INFO_EXPRESSION_TYPE("Class & Class?")!>x<!>
x++
<!DEBUG_INFO_EXPRESSION_TYPE("Class? & Class?")!>x<!>
<!DEBUG_INFO_EXPRESSION_TYPE("Class? & Class?")!>x<!>.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>equals<!>(10)
<!DEBUG_INFO_EXPRESSION_TYPE("Class? & Class?")!>x<!>.<!UNSAFE_CALL!>equals<!>(10)
}
}
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ fun case_2() {
<!DEBUG_INFO_EXPRESSION_TYPE("Class & Class?")!>x<!>
x--
<!DEBUG_INFO_EXPRESSION_TYPE("Class? & Class?")!>x<!>
<!DEBUG_INFO_EXPRESSION_TYPE("Class? & Class?")!>x<!>.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>equals<!>(10)
<!DEBUG_INFO_EXPRESSION_TYPE("Class? & Class?")!>x<!>.<!UNSAFE_CALL!>equals<!>(10)
}
/*
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ fun case_3() {
<!DEBUG_INFO_EXPRESSION_TYPE("Class & Class?")!>x<!>
--x
<!DEBUG_INFO_EXPRESSION_TYPE("Class? & Class?")!>x<!>
<!DEBUG_INFO_EXPRESSION_TYPE("Class? & Class?")!>x<!>.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>equals<!>(10)
<!DEBUG_INFO_EXPRESSION_TYPE("Class? & Class?")!>x<!>.<!UNSAFE_CALL!>equals<!>(10)
}
/*
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ fun case_4() {
<!DEBUG_INFO_EXPRESSION_TYPE("Class & Class?")!>x<!>
++x
<!DEBUG_INFO_EXPRESSION_TYPE("Class? & Class?")!>x<!>
<!DEBUG_INFO_EXPRESSION_TYPE("Class? & Class?")!>x<!>.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>equals<!>(10)
<!DEBUG_INFO_EXPRESSION_TYPE("Class? & Class?")!>x<!>.<!UNSAFE_CALL!>equals<!>(10)
}
// TESTCASE NUMBER: 5
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ fun case_5() {
<!DEBUG_INFO_EXPRESSION_TYPE("Class & Class?")!>x<!>
x = x + x
<!DEBUG_INFO_EXPRESSION_TYPE("Class? & Class?")!>x<!>
<!DEBUG_INFO_EXPRESSION_TYPE("Class? & Class?")!>x<!>.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>equals<!>(10)
<!DEBUG_INFO_EXPRESSION_TYPE("Class? & Class?")!>x<!>.<!UNSAFE_CALL!>equals<!>(10)
}
// TESTCASE NUMBER: 6
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ fun case_6() {
<!DEBUG_INFO_EXPRESSION_TYPE("Class & Class?")!>x<!>
x = x - x
<!DEBUG_INFO_EXPRESSION_TYPE("Class? & Class?")!>x<!>
<!DEBUG_INFO_EXPRESSION_TYPE("Class? & Class?")!>x<!>.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>equals<!>(10)
<!DEBUG_INFO_EXPRESSION_TYPE("Class? & Class?")!>x<!>.<!UNSAFE_CALL!>equals<!>(10)
}
}
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ fun case_7() {
<!DEBUG_INFO_EXPRESSION_TYPE("Class & Class?")!>x<!>
x += x
<!DEBUG_INFO_EXPRESSION_TYPE("Class? & Class?")!>x<!>
<!DEBUG_INFO_EXPRESSION_TYPE("Class? & Class?")!>x<!>.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>equals<!>(10)
<!DEBUG_INFO_EXPRESSION_TYPE("Class? & Class?")!>x<!>.<!UNSAFE_CALL!>equals<!>(10)
}
/*
@@ -105,5 +105,5 @@ fun case_8() {
<!DEBUG_INFO_EXPRESSION_TYPE("Class & Class?")!>x<!>
x -= x
<!DEBUG_INFO_EXPRESSION_TYPE("Class? & Class?")!>x<!>
<!DEBUG_INFO_EXPRESSION_TYPE("Class? & Class?")!>x<!>.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>equals<!>(10)
<!DEBUG_INFO_EXPRESSION_TYPE("Class? & Class?")!>x<!>.<!UNSAFE_CALL!>equals<!>(10)
}