FIR checker: differentiate UNSAFE_CALL from INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE

To do so, inside the root cause of inapplicable candidate errors,
we will record expected/actual type of receiver, if any.
That will help identifying inapplicable calls on nullable receiver.
This commit is contained in:
Jinseong Jeon
2021-01-26 16:03:27 -08:00
committed by Mikhail Glukhikh
parent 4b823eca21
commit e72ddbcbfe
275 changed files with 1426 additions and 1388 deletions
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ class A : Outer<Double, Short>() {
fun foo() {
Derived().foo() checkType { _<Outer<String, Int>.Inner<Char>>() }
Derived().baz() <!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>checkType<!> { <!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>_<!><Map<Char, String>>() }
Derived().baz() <!UNSAFE_CALL!>checkType<!> { <!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>_<!><Map<Char, String>>() }
A.B().bar() checkType { _<Outer<Float, Long>.Inner<String>>() }
A.B().x() <!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>checkType<!> { <!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>_<!><Map<String, Float>>() }
A.B().x() <!UNSAFE_CALL!>checkType<!> { <!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>_<!><Map<String, Float>>() }
}