[TD] Update diagnostics test data due to new test runners

Update includes:
- Changing syntax of `OI/`NI` tags from `<!NI;TAG!>` to `<!TAG{NI}!>`
- Fix some incorrect directives
- Change order of diagnostics in some places
- Remove ignored diagnostics from FIR test data (previously `DIAGNOSTICS` didn't work)
- Update FIR dumps in some places and add `FIR_IDENTICAL` if needed
- Replace all JAVAC_SKIP with SKIP_JAVAC directive
This commit is contained in:
Dmitriy Novozhilov
2020-12-07 10:08:56 +03:00
parent 1d04fecd29
commit e6b5cb5216
1823 changed files with 3014 additions and 2662 deletions
+12 -12
View File
@@ -12,39 +12,39 @@ class Delegate<T> {
fun <T> getT(): T = null!!
abstract class Test<in I, out O, P> {
abstract val type1: <!TYPE_VARIANCE_CONFLICT("I", "in", "out", "I")!>I<!>
abstract val type1: <!TYPE_VARIANCE_CONFLICT("I; in; out; I")!>I<!>
abstract val type2: O
abstract val type3: P
abstract val type4: In<I>
abstract val type5: In<<!TYPE_VARIANCE_CONFLICT("O", "out", "in", "In<O>")!>O<!>>
abstract val type5: In<<!TYPE_VARIANCE_CONFLICT("O; out; in; In<O>")!>O<!>>
<!TYPE_VARIANCE_CONFLICT("I", "in", "out", "I")!>val implicitType1<!> = getT<I>()
<!TYPE_VARIANCE_CONFLICT("I; in; out; I")!>val implicitType1<!> = getT<I>()
val implicitType2 = getT<O>()
val implicitType3 = getT<P>()
val implicitType4 = getT<In<I>>()
<!TYPE_VARIANCE_CONFLICT("O", "out", "in", "In<O>")!>val implicitType5<!> = getT<In<O>>()
<!TYPE_VARIANCE_CONFLICT("O; out; in; In<O>")!>val implicitType5<!> = getT<In<O>>()
<!TYPE_VARIANCE_CONFLICT("I", "in", "out", "I")!>val delegateType1<!> by Delegate<I>()
<!TYPE_VARIANCE_CONFLICT("I; in; out; I")!>val delegateType1<!> by Delegate<I>()
val delegateType2 by Delegate<O>()
val delegateType3 by Delegate<P>()
val delegateType4 by Delegate<In<I>>()
<!TYPE_VARIANCE_CONFLICT("O", "out", "in", "In<O>")!>val delegateType5<!> by Delegate<In<O>>()
<!TYPE_VARIANCE_CONFLICT("O; out; in; In<O>")!>val delegateType5<!> by Delegate<In<O>>()
abstract val I.receiver1: Int
abstract val <!TYPE_VARIANCE_CONFLICT("O", "out", "in", "O")!>O<!>.receiver2: Int
abstract val <!TYPE_VARIANCE_CONFLICT("O; out; in; O")!>O<!>.receiver2: Int
abstract val P.receiver3: Int
abstract val In<<!TYPE_VARIANCE_CONFLICT("I", "in", "out", "In<I>")!>I<!>>.receiver4: Int
abstract val In<<!TYPE_VARIANCE_CONFLICT("I; in; out; In<I>")!>I<!>>.receiver4: Int
abstract val In<O>.receiver5: Int
val <X : I> X.typeParameter1: Int get() = 0
val <X : <!TYPE_VARIANCE_CONFLICT("O", "out", "in", "O")!>O<!>> X.typeParameter2: Int get() = 0
val <X : <!TYPE_VARIANCE_CONFLICT("O; out; in; O")!>O<!>> X.typeParameter2: Int get() = 0
val <X : P> X.typeParameter3: Int get() = 0
val <X : In<<!TYPE_VARIANCE_CONFLICT("I", "in", "out", "In<I>")!>I<!>>> X.typeParameter4: Int get() = 0
val <X : In<<!TYPE_VARIANCE_CONFLICT("I; in; out; In<I>")!>I<!>>> X.typeParameter4: Int get() = 0
val <X : In<O>> X.typeParameter5: Int get() = 0
val <X> X.typeParameter6: Int where X : I get() = 0
val <X> X.typeParameter7: Int where X : <!TYPE_VARIANCE_CONFLICT("O", "out", "in", "O")!>O<!> get() = 0
val <X> X.typeParameter7: Int where X : <!TYPE_VARIANCE_CONFLICT("O; out; in; O")!>O<!> get() = 0
val <X> X.typeParameter8: Int where X : P get() = 0
val <X> X.typeParameter9: Int where X : In<<!TYPE_VARIANCE_CONFLICT("I", "in", "out", "In<I>")!>I<!>> get() = 0
val <X> X.typeParameter9: Int where X : In<<!TYPE_VARIANCE_CONFLICT("I; in; out; In<I>")!>I<!>> get() = 0
val <X> X.typeParameter0: Int where X : In<O> get() = 0
}