[FIR] Fix local variable tests.

- Mangle names for extension receivers in lambdas
 - Correctly mark anonymous variables and variables for arguments
   for destructuring declaration.

There is one failure remaining which is cause by lambda
type inference differences that leads to FIR having an explicit
return from the lambda whereas old frontend leads to an implicit
return. This difference is visible in debug stepping that the
local variables tests do because the implicit return has the line
number of the closing brace of the lambda. This change adds an
IrText test to make the difference clear.
This commit is contained in:
Mads Ager
2021-10-28 13:49:57 +02:00
committed by Mikhail Glukhikh
parent 99293de6e9
commit e1f6c19c83
31 changed files with 186 additions and 60 deletions
@@ -41,7 +41,9 @@ suspend fun box() {
// test.kt:16 box: $continuation:kotlin.coroutines.Continuation=TestKt$box$1, $result:java.lang.Object=null, $i$f$suspendBar:int=0:int, $this$extensionFun$iv$iv:AtomicInt=AtomicInt, $i$f$extensionFun:int=0:int
// test.kt:20 box: $continuation:kotlin.coroutines.Continuation=TestKt$box$1, $result:java.lang.Object=null, $i$f$suspendBar:int=0:int
// test.kt:21 box: $continuation:kotlin.coroutines.Continuation=TestKt$box$1, $result:java.lang.Object=null, $i$f$suspendBar:int=0:int, $i$a$-suspendCoroutineUninterceptedOrReturn-TestKt$suspendBar$2$iv:int=0:int
// EXPECTATIONS CLASSIC_FRONTEND
// test.kt:22 box: $continuation:kotlin.coroutines.Continuation=TestKt$box$1, $result:java.lang.Object=null, $i$f$suspendBar:int=0:int, $i$a$-suspendCoroutineUninterceptedOrReturn-TestKt$suspendBar$2$iv:int=0:int
// EXPECTATIONS
// test.kt:20 box: $continuation:kotlin.coroutines.Continuation=TestKt$box$1, $result:java.lang.Object=null, $i$f$suspendBar:int=0:int
// test.kt:23 box: $continuation:kotlin.coroutines.Continuation=TestKt$box$1, $result:java.lang.Object=null, $i$f$suspendBar:int=0:int
// test.kt:26 box: $continuation:kotlin.coroutines.Continuation=TestKt$box$1, $result:java.lang.Object=null