FIR: Add workaround for recursive contracts in ensureResolvedForCalls
This commit is contained in:
+10
-2
@@ -36,12 +36,20 @@ fun AbstractFirBasedSymbol<*>.ensureResolved(
|
|||||||
fun AbstractFirBasedSymbol<*>.ensureResolvedForCalls(
|
fun AbstractFirBasedSymbol<*>.ensureResolvedForCalls(
|
||||||
useSiteSession: FirSession,
|
useSiteSession: FirSession,
|
||||||
) {
|
) {
|
||||||
if ((fir as FirDeclaration).resolvePhase >= FirResolvePhase.CONTRACTS) return
|
val fir = fir as FirDeclaration
|
||||||
val requiredPhase = when (this.fir) {
|
if (fir.resolvePhase >= FirResolvePhase.CONTRACTS) return
|
||||||
|
val requiredPhase = when (fir) {
|
||||||
is FirFunction<*>, is FirProperty -> FirResolvePhase.CONTRACTS
|
is FirFunction<*>, is FirProperty -> FirResolvePhase.CONTRACTS
|
||||||
else -> FirResolvePhase.STATUS
|
else -> FirResolvePhase.STATUS
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if (requiredPhase == FirResolvePhase.CONTRACTS) {
|
||||||
|
// Workaround for recursive contracts in CLI
|
||||||
|
// Otherwise the assertion about presence of fir.session.phaseManager would fail
|
||||||
|
// See org.jetbrains.kotlin.fir.FirOldFrontendDiagnosticsTestWithStdlibGenerated.Contracts.Dsl.Errors.testRecursiveContract
|
||||||
|
if (fir.session.phaseManager == null) return
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
ensureResolved(requiredPhase, useSiteSession)
|
ensureResolved(requiredPhase, useSiteSession)
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user