[FIR2IR] Consider isExpect value of super members during fake-overrides generating
It's important for FIR2IR and IrActualizer Because `isExpect` is a part of signature, and it's considered during actualization
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Space Team
parent
41cb2ce3d8
commit
d06d3ff467
+10
@@ -737,6 +737,16 @@ public class KlibIrTextTestCaseGenerated extends AbstractKlibIrTextTestCase {
|
||||
runTest("compiler/testData/ir/irText/declarations/multiplatform/expectIntersectionOverride.kt");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@TestMetadata("expectMemberInNotExpectClass.kt")
|
||||
public void testExpectMemberInNotExpectClass() throws Exception {
|
||||
runTest("compiler/testData/ir/irText/declarations/multiplatform/expectMemberInNotExpectClass.kt");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@TestMetadata("expectMemberInNotExpectClassFir.kt")
|
||||
public void testExpectMemberInNotExpectClassFir() throws Exception {
|
||||
runTest("compiler/testData/ir/irText/declarations/multiplatform/expectMemberInNotExpectClassFir.kt");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@TestMetadata("expectedEnumClass.kt")
|
||||
public void testExpectedEnumClass() throws Exception {
|
||||
runTest("compiler/testData/ir/irText/declarations/multiplatform/expectedEnumClass.kt");
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user