JVM_IR. Minor. Update bytecode text test to JVM_IR or create issues when this

is not feasible.

compiler/testData/codegen/bytecodeText/assert/jvmCrossinlineAssertInLambda.kt

@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+// This test is ignored until KT-36794 is fixed
 // IGNORE_BACKEND: JVM
 // IGNORE_BACKEND: JVM_IR
 // KOTLIN_CONFIGURATION_FLAGS: ASSERTIONS_MODE=jvm

compiler/testData/codegen/bytecodeText/assert/jvmNestedClass.kt

@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+// This test is ignored until KT-36794 is fixed.
 // IGNORE_BACKEND: JVM
 // IGNORE_BACKEND: JVM_IR
 // KOTLIN_CONFIGURATION_FLAGS: ASSERTIONS_MODE=jvm

compiler/testData/codegen/bytecodeText/coroutines/debug/localVariableCorrectLabel.kt

@@ -14,8 +14,12 @@ fun main(args: Array<String>) {
 @BuilderInference
 suspend fun SequenceScope<Int>.awaitSeq(): Int = 42
 
-// 1 LOCALVARIABLE a I L17 L.* 3
-// 1 LINENUMBER 8 L17
-// Adding ignore flags below the test since the test relies on line numbers.
-// IGNORE_BACKEND: JVM_IR
+// label numbers differ in BEs
 
+// JVM_TEMPLATES
+// 1 LOCALVARIABLE a I L17 L.*
+// 1 LINENUMBER 8 L17
+
+// JVM_IR_TEMPLATES
+// 1 LOCALVARIABLE a I L14 L.*
+// 1 LINENUMBER 8 L14

compiler/testData/codegen/bytecodeText/coroutines/debug/thisAndResultInLvt.kt

@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
-// IGNORE_BACKEND: JVM_IR
 suspend fun dummy() {}
 
 val c: suspend () -> Unit = {
@@ -13,6 +12,10 @@ class A {
     }
 }
 
+// BEs generate continuation classes differently, JVM_IR generates more correctly
+
+// JVM_TEMPLATES
+// invokeSuspend
 // 1 LOCALVARIABLE this LThisAndResultInLvtKt\$c\$1; L0 L.* 0
 // c's lambda and foo's continuation
 // 2 LOCALVARIABLE \$result Ljava/lang/Object; L0 L.* 1
@@ -23,3 +26,17 @@ class A {
 // 1 LOCALVARIABLE s Ljava/lang/String; L0 L.* 2
 // 1 LOCALVARIABLE block Lkotlin/jvm/functions/Function2; L0 L.* 3
 // 1 LOCALVARIABLE \$continuation Lkotlin/coroutines/Continuation; L2 L.* 6
+
+// JVM_IR_TEMPLATES
+// <init>, invoke, invokeSuspend, create
+// 4 LOCALVARIABLE this LThisAndResultInLvtKt\$c\$1; L0 L.* 0
+// TODO: Continuation are generated even for tail-call suspend functions: KT-36795
+// c's lambda and foo's and dummy's continuation
+// 3 LOCALVARIABLE \$result Ljava/lang/Object; L0 L.* 1
+
+// foo and <init>
+// 2 LOCALVARIABLE this LA; L0 L.* 0
+// 1 LOCALVARIABLE a LA; L0 L.* 1
+// 1 LOCALVARIABLE s Ljava/lang/String; L0 L.* 2
+// 1 LOCALVARIABLE block Lkotlin/jvm/functions/Function2; L0 L.* 3
+// 1 LOCALVARIABLE \$continuation Lkotlin/coroutines/Continuation; L2 L.* 6

compiler/testData/codegen/bytecodeText/coroutines/varValueConflictsWithTable.kt

@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+// This test checks, that different variables occupy the same slot
+// In JVM_IR, however, loop variable's lifetime goes beyond the loop itself, thus the test has no sense in JVM_IR
 // IGNORE_BACKEND: JVM_IR
 // WITH_COROUTINES
 

compiler/testData/codegen/bytecodeText/coroutines/varValueConflictsWithTableSameSort.kt

@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+// This test checks, that different variables occupy the same slot
+// In JVM_IR, however, loop variable's lifetime goes beyond the loop itself, thus the test has no sense in JVM_IR
 // IGNORE_BACKEND: JVM_IR
 // WITH_COROUTINES
 

compiler/testData/codegen/bytecodeText/inline/inlineSuspendReifiedNoSpilling.kt

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
+// $$forInline suffix is not needed: KT-36797
+// JVM_IR generates fake inliner variable with suffix $$forInline, when old BE does not do this
 // IGNORE_BACKEND: JVM_IR
-// In JVM_IR $i$f variables occupy different slots
-
 interface ApplicationCall
 
 interface AuthenticationService {