[NI] Do not avoid trivial constraints if they aren't from upper bounds

Since we skipped trivial constraint with `Any?` from parameter type of
 function `equals`, the compiler thought that there is no proper
 constraints (upper bounds do not matter here) and marked resolved
 call as a failed one, then diagnostic about missing equals was added

 Also, tune `TrivialConstraintTypeInferenceOracle` for `Any?`-like
 constraints

 #KT-30724 Fixed
This commit is contained in:
Mikhail Zarechenskiy
2019-04-01 02:58:56 +03:00
parent 5fa518fd55
commit c458393e2f
17 changed files with 74 additions and 26 deletions
@@ -2393,6 +2393,11 @@ public class FirDiagnosticsSmokeTestGenerated extends AbstractFirDiagnosticsSmok
runTest("compiler/testData/diagnostics/tests/callableReference/resolve/overloadsMember.kt");
}
@TestMetadata("resolveEqualsOperatorWithAnyExpectedType.kt")
public void testResolveEqualsOperatorWithAnyExpectedType() throws Exception {
runTest("compiler/testData/diagnostics/tests/callableReference/resolve/resolveEqualsOperatorWithAnyExpectedType.kt");
}
@TestMetadata("valVsFun.kt")
public void testValVsFun() throws Exception {
runTest("compiler/testData/diagnostics/tests/callableReference/resolve/valVsFun.kt");