JVM IR: prevent behavior change with operator dot calls on literals

#KT-42321 Fixed
This commit is contained in:
Alexander Udalov
2021-02-25 20:20:03 +01:00
parent c7498dd74d
commit bf844aa8e4
22 changed files with 920 additions and 50 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
// This test exists only to check that we don't accidentally break the buggy behavior of the old JVM backend in JVM IR (KT-42321).
// Feel free to remove it as soon as there's no language version where such code is allowed (KT-38895).
abstract class C<L> {
abstract fun takeT(x: L)
}
fun testLongDotCall(c1: C<Long>) {
c1.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1.plus(2))
c1.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1.minus(2))
c1.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1.times(2))
c1.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1.div(2))
c1.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1.rem(2))
c1.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1.inc())
c1.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1.dec())
c1.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1.unaryPlus())
c1.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1.unaryMinus())
c1.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1.shl(2))
c1.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1.shr(2))
c1.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1.ushr(2))
c1.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1.and(2))
c1.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1.or(2))
c1.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1.xor(2))
c1.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1.inv())
}
fun testShortDotCall(c2: C<Short>) {
c2.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1.plus(2))
c2.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1.inc())
c2.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1.dec())
c2.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1.shr(2))
c2.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1.inv())
}
fun testByteDotCall(c3: C<Byte>) {
c3.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1.plus(2))
c3.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1.inc())
c3.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1.dec())
c3.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1.shr(2))
c3.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1.inv())
}
fun testLongOperatorInfixCall(c4: C<Long>) {
c4.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1 + 2)
c4.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1 - 2)
c4.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1 * 2)
c4.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1 / 2)
c4.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1 % 2)
c4.takeT(+1)
c4.takeT(-1)
c4.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1 shl 2)
c4.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1 shr 2)
c4.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1 ushr 2)
c4.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1 and 2)
c4.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1 or 2)
c4.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1 xor 2)
}
fun testShortOperatorInfixCall(c5: C<Short>) {
c5.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1 + 2)
c5.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1 shr 2)
}
fun testByteOperatorInfixCall(c6: C<Byte>) {
c6.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1 + 2)
c6.<!INAPPLICABLE_CANDIDATE!>takeT<!>(1 shr 2)
}
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
// This test exists only to check that we don't accidentally break the buggy behavior of the old JVM backend in JVM IR (KT-42321).
// Feel free to remove it as soon as there's no language version where such code is allowed (KT-38895).
abstract class C<L> {
abstract fun takeT(x: L)
}
fun testLongDotCall(c1: C<Long>) {
c1.takeT(1.plus(2))
c1.takeT(1.minus(2))
c1.takeT(1.times(2))
c1.takeT(1.div(2))
c1.takeT(1.rem(2))
c1.takeT(<!TYPE_MISMATCH!>1.inc()<!>)
c1.takeT(<!TYPE_MISMATCH!>1.dec()<!>)
c1.takeT(1.unaryPlus())
c1.takeT(1.unaryMinus())
c1.takeT(1.shl(2))
c1.takeT(1.shr(2))
c1.takeT(1.ushr(2))
c1.takeT(1.and(2))
c1.takeT(1.or(2))
c1.takeT(1.xor(2))
c1.takeT(1.inv())
}
fun testShortDotCall(c2: C<Short>) {
c2.takeT(1.plus(2))
c2.takeT(<!TYPE_MISMATCH!>1.inc()<!>)
c2.takeT(<!TYPE_MISMATCH!>1.dec()<!>)
c2.takeT(1.shr(2))
c2.takeT(1.inv())
}
fun testByteDotCall(c3: C<Byte>) {
c3.takeT(1.plus(2))
c3.takeT(<!TYPE_MISMATCH!>1.inc()<!>)
c3.takeT(<!TYPE_MISMATCH!>1.dec()<!>)
c3.takeT(1.shr(2))
c3.takeT(1.inv())
}
fun testLongOperatorInfixCall(c4: C<Long>) {
c4.takeT(1 + 2)
c4.takeT(1 - 2)
c4.takeT(1 * 2)
c4.takeT(1 / 2)
c4.takeT(1 % 2)
c4.takeT(+1)
c4.takeT(-1)
c4.takeT(1 shl 2)
c4.takeT(1 shr 2)
c4.takeT(1 ushr 2)
c4.takeT(1 and 2)
c4.takeT(1 or 2)
c4.takeT(1 xor 2)
}
fun testShortOperatorInfixCall(c5: C<Short>) {
c5.takeT(1 + 2)
c5.takeT(1 shr 2)
}
fun testByteOperatorInfixCall(c6: C<Byte>) {
c6.takeT(1 + 2)
c6.takeT(1 shr 2)
}
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
package
public fun testByteDotCall(/*0*/ c3: C<kotlin.Byte>): kotlin.Unit
public fun testByteOperatorInfixCall(/*0*/ c6: C<kotlin.Byte>): kotlin.Unit
public fun testLongDotCall(/*0*/ c1: C<kotlin.Long>): kotlin.Unit
public fun testLongOperatorInfixCall(/*0*/ c4: C<kotlin.Long>): kotlin.Unit
public fun testShortDotCall(/*0*/ c2: C<kotlin.Short>): kotlin.Unit
public fun testShortOperatorInfixCall(/*0*/ c5: C<kotlin.Short>): kotlin.Unit
public abstract class C</*0*/ L> {
public constructor C</*0*/ L>()
public open override /*1*/ /*fake_override*/ fun equals(/*0*/ other: kotlin.Any?): kotlin.Boolean
public open override /*1*/ /*fake_override*/ fun hashCode(): kotlin.Int
public abstract fun takeT(/*0*/ x: L): kotlin.Unit
public open override /*1*/ /*fake_override*/ fun toString(): kotlin.String
}